Inferring physical fields in coupled systems with unknown parameters from incomplete observations using physics-constrained attentive neural operators
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Given incomplete measurements of a single physical field in a coupled system with unknown parameters, can we infer its full physical state and identify the underlying parameters? This problem is challenging because multiple coupled fields must be reconstructed simultaneously from limited observations of only one, while the system parameters are unknown. In this work, we propose a machine learning framework for full-field reconstruction and parameter identification of unknown physical systems from sparse observations of a single physical field. Specifically, the cross-attention encoder propagates sparse sensor observations onto a regular grid to construct a sensor-conditioned latent representation, while a Fourier neural operator (FNO) decoder captures global spatial dependencies to reconstruct all coupled physical fields. The network parameters and unknown physical parameters are jointly optimized by minimizing observation losses, governing equation residuals, and boundary/initial condition constraints. The proposed approach is validated on two- and three-dimensional lid-driven cavity flows, a two-dimensional cylinder wake, and a two-dimensional non-ideal magnetohydrodynamics problem, demonstrating the recovery performance of unobserved fields and physical parameters from incomplete observations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 46 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 5 Oct 2026.
Builds on
17 of 46 references.
References · 17
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2021Characterizing possible failure modes in physics-informed neural networkscited by 643
- 2020When and why PINNs fail to train: A neural tangent kernel perspectivecited by 634
- 2021Learning the solution operator of parametric partial differential equations with physics-informed DeepOnetscited by 540
- 2021Physics-Informed Neural Operator for Learning Partial Differential Equationscited by 527
- 2025Muon is Scalable for LLM Trainingcited by 428
- 2020Estimates on the generalization error of Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) for approximating a class of inverse problems for PDEscited by 102
- 2018Deep Learning of Vortex Induced Vibrationscited by 76
- 2019Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Multiphysics Data Assimilation with Application to Subsurface Transportcited by 61
- 2021Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with Voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learningcited by 57
5 more
- 2023RecFNO: a resolution-invariant flow and heat field reconstruction method from sparse observations via Fourier neural operatorcited by 19
- 2023Magnetohydrodynamics with Physics Informed Neural Operatorscited by 7
- 2024Learning Hidden Physics and System Parameters with Deep Operator Networkscited by 7
- 2024Reconstructing unsteady flows from sparse, noisy measurements with a physics-constrained convolutional neural networkcited by 3
- 2026Distributed physics-informed neural networks via domain decomposition for fast flow reconstructioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.