Low-Fidelity FDM Spectral Guidance for Neural Eigenvalue Solvers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Operator eigenvalue problems appear throughout science. Classical methods usually discretize the operator into a matrix and then solve the resulting matrix eigenvalue problem. This works well in low dimensions, but fine grids quickly become expensive in both memory and computation as the dimension grows. Neural network based solvers avoid storing these large grids, but recent state of the art neural methods can require hundreds of thousands of training steps and may struggle to find the desired eigenvalues. We show that the two approaches can help each other. A coarse finite difference method (FDM) calculation acts as a cheap numerical model of the operator spectrum. We use the approximate eigenvalues as fixed shifts during the training of the neural solver, as they only need to locate the relevant part of the spectrum. We also introduce Stabilized Inverse Power Method Neural Network (SIPMNN), a more stable training procedure for higher-dimensional problems. Across five test problems at d=10, the combined approach is more accurate overall than the tested fully neural alternatives while using eight to ten times fewer iterations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 12 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.
Builds on
6 of 12 references.
References · 6
- 2017The Deep Ritz method: A deep learning-based numerical algorithm for solving variational problemscited by 583
- 2018Spectral Inference Networks: Unifying Deep and Spectral Learningcited by 35
- 2022NeuralEF: Deconstructing Kernels by Deep Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2024Operator SVD with Neural Networks via Nested Low-Rank Approximationcited by 13
- 2022Neural Networks Based on Power Method and Inverse Power Method for Solving Linear Eigenvalue Problemscited by 8
- 2025STNet: Spectral Transformation Network for Solving Operator Eigenvalue Problemcited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.