mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

MERCI Cards: An LLM Evaluation and Deployment Framework for High-Stakes Domains

arXiv 2610.04430 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.HCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

As LLMs are increasingly deployed in high-stakes professional workflows, engineers and researchers require principled protocols to systematically track, monitor, and improve model performance across deployment cycles. We present a mathematical framework for iterative LLM evaluation and deployment, and demonstrate its application to AI systems used in criminal justice. Our framework formalizes LLM integration in high-stakes, high-risk, and resource-constrained domains across model selection, rubric design, evaluations and deployment via a weighted multi-objective optimization. We demonstrate that MERCI Cards can guide improvements of the system across deployment iterations, direct developer attention toward under-performing areas, and focus user attention on validation and error-correction in the LLM's outputs.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

7 of 19 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024A Survey on LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 1,423
  2. 2024Humans or LLMs as the Judge? A Study on Judgement Biasescited by 323
  3. 2024Self-Preference Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 258
  4. 2024Who Validates the Validators? Aligning LLM-Assisted Evaluation of LLM Outputs with Human Preferencescited by 144
  5. 2025Play Favorites: A Statistical Method to Measure Self-Bias in LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 36
  6. 2025Beyond the Surface: Measuring Self-Preference in LLM Judgmentscited by 31
  7. 2026To Build or Not to Build? Factors that Lead to Non-Development or Abandonment of AI Systemscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.