mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Hierarchical Credit Assignment for RLVR on Fused Gromov-Wasserstein Geometry

arXiv 2610.04344 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: LLM reasoning → Reinforcement learning for reasoning

Abstract (arXiv)

Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has been shown to improve the reasoning capability of large language models (LLMs) across diverse reasoning tasks. However, group-based RLVR methods, such as GRPO, assign a uniform advantage to all tokens within rollouts of the same outcome. While existing works refine credit assignment of GRPO based on local signals such as token locations or entropy, they often fail to capture the global semantic novelty of a reasoning behavior relative to the current policy. In this work, we propose a hierarchical credit assignment approach for group-based RLVR methods, called HarA, which identifies and encourages semantically novel reasoning behaviors during RLVR. HarA represents each sampled rollout as a distribution over the hidden states and locations of tokens, and computes the Fused Gromov-Wasserstein (FGW) barycenters of all rollouts with the same outcome, capturing the internal reasoning patterns in the latent space under the current policy. The semantic novelty of a reasoning element can then be measured by its contribution to the FGW distance between the current rollout and the barycenter. While solving the FGW formulation is expensive, we introduce an anchor-guided linearization that turns it into a Wasserstein formulation solvable via the Sinkhorn algorithm efficiently. By reweighing token-level advantage of group-based RLVR methods based on the novelty signals, HarA highlights novel reasoning behaviors at flexible granularities to encourage fine-grained LLM exploration. Extensive experiments across three group-based RLVR methods show that our plug-and-play method effectively enhances the exploration of LLMs, outperforming existing methods across diverse reasoning benchmarks.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Reinforcement learning for reasoning, one of 17 directions in LLM reasoning. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards Implicitly Incentivizes Correct Reasoning in Base LLMs
  2. 2026Orchestrating Tokens and Sequences: Dynamic Hybrid Policy Optimization for RLVR
  3. 2026Learning from Own Solutions: Self-Conditioned Credit Assignment for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards
  4. 2025Does Reinforcement Learning Really Incentivize Reasoning Capacity in LLMs Beyond the Base Model?
  5. 2026Beyond Uniform Credit Assignment: Selective Eligibility Traces for RLVR
  6. 2025Limits of Generalization in RLVR: Two Case Studies in Mathematical Reasoning
  7. 2025GRPO-λ: Credit Assignment improves LLM Reasoning
  8. 2025RLPR: Extrapolating RLVR to General Domains without Verifiers