mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Adaptive Bregman Alternating Projections for Feasible Gromov-Wasserstein Learning

arXiv 2610.04264 ↗First posted 3 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CG math.OCcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The Gromov-Wasserstein (GW) problem compares structured distributions without requiring a shared feature space or known correspondences, but its nonconvex objective and coupled marginal constraints make computation challenging. Bregman alternating projected gradient (BAPG) uses inexpensive alternating row and column updates, yet its fixed-penalty relaxation leaves a persistent feasibility gap. We propose Adaptive KL-BAPG (A-KL-BAPG), which combines a finite fixed-penalty burn-in with a guarded increasing-penalty phase. At each tail iteration, the method reuses BAPG's alternating updates and backtracks a delayed-power step until a Sinkhorn-inspired projective-diameter safeguard is satisfied. We prove finite termination of the backtracking at each iteration and show that the feasibility gap vanishes asymptotically. We further establish a best-iterate O(1/log N) bound for the weighted squared corrected residual and, under a support regularity condition, the existence of a stationary accumulation point for the original GW problem. This distinguishes A-KL-BAPG from fixed-penalty BAPG, whose stationarity guarantees are given for the relaxed problem. Experiments show that A-KL-BAPG achieves a favorable balance of accuracy, objective value, feasibility, and stationarity relative to BAPG variants, projection-based methods, and task-specific baselines. For synthetic and real graph alignment problems, it closely matches the accuracy and objective value of fixed-penalty KL-BAPG while reducing the marginal feasibility gap by 62-99% and the projected stationarity residual by 28-98%. Heterogeneous domain adaptation experiments show a similar pattern: A-KL-BAPG maintains comparable target accuracy and objective values while achieving better feasibility and stationarity than fixed-penalty KL-BAPG.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 39 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 3 Oct 2026.

Builds on

14 of 39 references.

References · 14

  1. 2013Sinkhorn Distances: Lightspeed Computation of Optimal Transportation Distancescited by 2,316
  2. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  3. 2015Optimal Transport for Domain Adaptationcited by 463
  4. 2017Joint Distribution Optimal Transportation for Domain Adaptationcited by 282
  5. 2018Optimal Transport for structured data with application on graphscited by 172
  6. 2019Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Matching and Node Embeddingcited by 126
  7. 2019Scalable Gromov-Wasserstein Learning for Graph Partitioning and Matchingcited by 103
  8. 2020Generalized Spectral Clustering via Gromov-Wasserstein Learningcited by 38
  9. 2023A Convergent Single-Loop Algorithm for Relaxation of Gromov-Wasserstein in Graph Datacited by 11
  10. 2024Annealed Sinkhorn for Optimal Transport: convergence, regularization path and debiasingcited by 7
  11. 2022Mirror Sinkhorn: Fast Online Optimization on Transport Polytopescited by 6
  12. 2024Spurious Stationarity and Hardness Results for Bregman Proximal-Type Algorithmscited by 3
2 more
  1. 2022Unsupervised Domain Adaptation for Extra Features in the Target Domain Using Optimal Transportcited by 1
  2. 2026A Provably Convergent and Practical Algorithm for Gromov--Wasserstein Optimal Transportcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.