S2-PINN: Stochastic Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networks
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Uncertainty quantification (UQ) for random partial differential equations (PDEs) is ubiquitous in computational science and engineering. However, classical spectral solvers for this class of problems face the curse of dimensionality, and existing neural solvers often ignore the stochastic structure that makes moments and calibration tractable. We introduce a stochastic separable physics-informed neural network, dubbed S2-PINN, that represents the solution u(t,x,Z) of a random PDE with a learnable Gaussian spatial dictionary, Fourier temporal features, and a generalized polynomial chaos (gPC) stochastic basis, coupled by a low-rank Canonical Polyadic (CP) tensor decomposition core. The method is trained with a hybrid strong-form and gPC-projected residual loss. Our theoretical analysis establishes that the separable class is dense in L2 under mild conditions, and the projected residual corresponds exactly to a stochastic Galerkin constraint. Furthermore, we show that mini-batch projection coefficients are logarithmically dependent on the number of gPC modes, and that the orthogonality penalty controls the conditioning of the learned spatial dictionary. Using four manufactured random PDE benchmarks, we show that S2-PINN outperforms nine baselines in terms of mean and variance accuracy, as well as calibration, while using significantly fewer parameters. Further evaluations on non-manufactured Poisson and Darcy problems, a stochastic Navier--Stokes problem, a diffusion scaling study of higher random dimensions, and two stochastic inverse problems reveal the generalization capabilities of the proposed structure. Together, these results support stochastic separability as an effective design principle for physics-informed neural UQ. The code for the experiments can be found in https://github.com/DMax1314/s2pinn
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
17 of 37 references.
References · 17
- 2016Simple and Scalable Predictive Uncertainty Estimation using Deep Ensemblescited by 3,926
- 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
- 2019DeepONet: Learning nonlinear operators for identifying differential equations based on the universal approximation theorem of operatorscited by 2,018
- 2020B-PINNs: Bayesian Physics-Informed Neural Networks for Forward and Inverse PDE Problems with Noisy Datacited by 335
- 2022Uncertainty Quantification in Scientific Machine Learning: Methods, Metrics, and Comparisonscited by 170
- 2018Quantifying total uncertainty in physics-informed neural networks for solving forward and inverse stochastic problemscited by 147
- 2022Physics-Informed Deep Neural Operator Networkscited by 113
- 2023Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 66
- 2023Physics-Informed Polynomial Chaos Expansionscited by 16
- 2024Functional Tensor Decompositions for Physics-Informed Neural Networkscited by 13
- 2022TT-PINN: A Tensor-Compressed Neural PDE Solver for Edge Computingcited by 7
- 2024Separable Physics-Informed Neural Networks for the solution of elasticity problemscited by 6
5 more
- 2026Expanding the Chaos: Neural Operator for Stochastic (Partial) Differential Equationscited by 5
- 2025Interpolating Neural Network-Tensor Decomposition (INN-TD): a scalable and interpretable approach for large-scale physics-based problemscited by 4
- 2021TTRISK: Tensor Train Decomposition Algorithm for Risk Averse Optimizationcited by 1
- 2023Smoothed Moreau-Yosida Tensor Train Approximation of State-constrained Optimization Problems under Uncertaintycited by 1
- 2024Tensor train solution to uncertain optimization problems with shared sparsity penaltycited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.