Learning a Fact Is Not Learning How to Retrieve It
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
A model trained on "The capital of X is Y" may produce "Y" after "The capital of X is" but fail after "The capital of X:." We call these different ways of eliciting the same fact request forms. To separate learning a fact from retrieving it, we train two models in two stages. In the first stage (request-form training), one model sees each fact in five forms and the other sees the same facts only as statements. In the second stage (target-fact training), both receive identical training on new facts, all as statements. Both then retrieve the new facts almost equally well from statements, but differ sharply on other request forms. Thus, a model can learn how to retrieve through a request form before it learns the facts. To understand this difference, we examine the hidden state immediately before the answer, which we call the context state. When given two different request forms for the same fact, the model trained on five forms in stage one produces more similar context states than the model trained on statements alone in that stage. Changing this state at retrieval time can enable or prevent retrieval of an already learned fact, and the same effect transfers across facts and factual relations, such as capitals and currencies. To test its role during learning, we change the context state only during target-fact training. This intervention changes later retrieval without intervention at test time. Together, these results show that later retrieval depends on earlier request-form experience and the context state during fact learning.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 43 of its 47 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
43 of 47 references.
References · 43
- 2021Prefix-Tuning: Optimizing Continuous Prompts for Generationcited by 3,915
- 2021The Power of Scale for Parameter-Efficient Prompt Tuningcited by 3,795
- 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,780
- 2022Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTcited by 2,691
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,786
- 2022Rethinking the Role of Demonstrations: What Makes In-Context Learning Work?cited by 1,434
- 2020Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Are Key-Value Memoriescited by 1,336
- 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
- 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
- 2021Fantastically Ordered Prompts and Where to Find Them: Overcoming Few-Shot Prompt Order Sensitivitycited by 1,135
- 2023LIMA: Less Is More for Alignmentcited by 1,100
- 2023Steering Llama 2 via Contrastive Activation Additioncited by 1,085
31 more
- 2019How Can We Know What Language Models Know?cited by 959
- 2023Steering Language Models With Activation Engineeringcited by 922
- 2023Quantifying Language Models' Sensitivity to Spurious Features in Prompt Design or: How I learned to start worrying about prompt formattingcited by 817
- 2023Dissecting Recall of Factual Associations in Auto-Regressive Language Modelscited by 528
- 2023The Reversal Curse: LLMs trained on "A is B" fail to learn "B is A"cited by 407
- 2021Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 364
- 2025Persona Vectors: Monitoring and Controlling Character Traits in Language Modelscited by 345
- 2023In-Context Learning Creates Task Vectorscited by 312
- 2023State of What Art? A Call for Multi-Prompt LLM Evaluationcited by 310
- 2023Function Vectors in Large Language Modelscited by 308
- 2023Physics of Language Models: Part 3.1, Knowledge Storage and Extractioncited by 270
- 2021Surface Form Competition: Why the Highest Probability Answer Isn't Always Rightcited by 263
- 2023The Unlocking Spell on Base LLMs: Rethinking Alignment via In-Context Learningcited by 257
- 2023In-context Vectors: Making In Context Learning More Effective and Controllable Through Latent Space Steeringcited by 245
- 2024Does Fine-Tuning LLMs on New Knowledge Encourage Hallucinations?cited by 232
- 2023Linearity of Relation Decoding in Transformer Language Modelscited by 200
- 2024ReFT: Representation Finetuning for Language Modelscited by 197
- 2024Improving Instruction-Following in Language Models through Activation Steeringcited by 160
- 2023Taken out of context: On measuring situational awareness in LLMscited by 143
- 2024Synthetic continued pretrainingcited by 60
- 2024Instruction-tuned Language Models are Better Knowledge Learnerscited by 55
- 2023Do Models Really Learn to Follow Instructions? An Empirical Study of Instruction Tuningcited by 49
- 2024Reverse Training to Nurse the Reversal Cursecited by 49
- 2025Steering Out-of-Distribution Generalization with Concept Ablation Fine-Tuningcited by 39
- 2025Between Circuits and Chomsky: Pre-pretraining on Formal Languages Imparts Linguistic Biasescited by 37
- 2023Injecting structural hints: Using language models to study inductive biases in language learningcited by 35
- 2024Co-occurrence is not Factual Association in Language Modelscited by 12
- 2023Implicit meta-learning may lead language models to trust more reliable sourcescited by 10
- 2025From Style to Facts: Mapping the Boundaries of Knowledge Injection with Finetuningcited by 8
- 2024Mix-CPT: A Domain Adaptation Framework via Decoupling Knowledge Learning and Format Alignmentcited by 7
- 2023Measuring the Knowledge Acquisition-Utilization Gap in Pretrained Language Modelscited by 4
Built on by
Not cited yet.