mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

The Neuro-Physical Inverter: A Modular Framework for Magnetotelluric Inversion Coupling Ensemble Conditioning with Residual Learning

arXiv 2610.03225 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We present the Neuro-Physical Inverter (NPI), a modular, uncertainty-aware framework for geophysical inversion that couples ensemble-based conditioning with constrained residual learning, demonstrated in the 1D magnetotelluric (MT) setting as a controlled testbed. The framework operates in two stages. An Ensemble-Conditional Gaussian Process (EnsCGP) conditions a prior ensemble of resistivity models on the observed response, producing a physically admissible reference ensemble. A residual-learning neural network then predicts targeted corrections to this reference, trained on synthetic data and fine-tuned per station for field application through a physics-coupled objective. Because an ensemble is conditioned, refined, and propagated through both stages, every estimate carries an associated ensemble spread. Synthetic experiments show that NPI systematically reduces ensemble-mean error without destabilizing the ensemble. Applied to broadband MT data from the Gabbs Valley geothermal region (Nevada, USA), NPI reduces the across-station mean misfit over the mid-period band while retaining comparable ensemble spread. The propagated ensemble yields a factor of uncertainty that serves as an operational measure of constraint within the assumed model class. Both stages are dimension-agnostic in formulation, and the design principles established here are intended to scale to higher-dimensional parameterizations.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 84 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 84 references.

References · 12

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2015Dropout as a Bayesian Approximation: Representing Model Uncertainty in Deep Learningcited by 4,448
  3. 2017Physics-guided Neural Networks (PGNN): An Application in Lake Temperature Modelingcited by 131
  4. 2021Interpretable Deep Learning: Interpretation, Interpretability, Trustworthiness, and Beyondcited by 118
  5. 2023Residual Corrective Diffusion Modeling for Km-scale Atmospheric Downscalingcited by 110
  6. 2018Deep learning electromagnetic inversion with convolutional neural networkscited by 13
  7. 2020Informative Neural Ensemble Kalman Learningcited by 6
  8. 2019Inversion of 1D frequency- and time-domain electromagnetic data with convolutional neural networkscited by 3
  9. 2024Physically Guided Deep Unsupervised Inversion for 1D Magnetotelluric Modelscited by 2
  10. 2025PreAdaptFWI: Pretrained-Based Adaptive Residual Learning for Full-Waveform Inversion Without Dataset Dependencycited by 1
  11. 2026Enhanced 3D Gravity Inversion Using ResU-Net with Density Logging Constraints: A Dual-Phase Training Approachcited by 1
  12. 2026Ensemble-Conditional Gaussian Processes (Ens-CGP): Representation, Geometry, and Inferencecited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.