Geometry-Aligned Semantic Matching for Cross-Modal Planar Image Registration
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Cross-modal image matching establishes stable and accurate geometric correspondences across modalities for planar registration. Existing semantic representations provide cross-modal consistency, but semantic similarity does not necessarily imply geometric correspondence. Meanwhile, fine-grained CNN features provide accurate local details but lack global cross-modal semantic guidance for stable refinement. To address these issues, we propose CDPM, which first establishes geometrically consistent semantic representations and then preserves their dominant role in correspondence estimation during fine-grained localization. Specifically, we progressively adapt DINOv3 using geometrically consistent cross-modal patch pairs, enabling feature similarity to better reflect true cross-modal spatial correspondences. We then construct a DINO-Centric Feature Pyramid, where multi-scale DINO representations maintain stable cross-modal correspondences, while a lightweight CNN branch provides auxiliary structural details for precise local refinement. Extensive experiments on three cross-modal datasets demonstrate the superior performance of CDPM. On VIS-IR, compared with the dense matcher RoMa, CDPM improves AUC@3/5/10/20 by 7.36, 13.40, 13.75, and 10.42 percentage points, respectively, and reduces mACE from 5.83 to 2.78 pixels. It also outperforms RoMa v2 across all metrics while requiring 45.6% fewer FLOPs. The online demo and dataset are available, and the code will be released on our project page at https://warren-wzw.github.io/CDPM/.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 42 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
25 of 42 references.
References · 25
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2023DINOv2: Learning Robust Visual Features without Supervisioncited by 7,974
- 2021Masked Autoencoders Are Scalable Vision Learnerscited by 7,403
- 2021Vision Transformers for Dense Predictioncited by 1,803
- 2017SuperPoint: Self-Supervised Interest Point Detection and Descriptioncited by 1,320
- 2021LoFTR: Detector-Free Local Feature Matching with Transformerscited by 984
- 2018MVSNet: Depth Inference for Unstructured Multi-view Stereocited by 788
- 2018MegaDepth: Learning Single-View Depth Prediction from Internet Photoscited by 737
- 2023LightGlue: Local Feature Matching at Light Speedcited by 590
- 2022Target-aware Dual Adversarial Learning and a Multi-scenario Multi-Modality Benchmark to Fuse Infrared and Visible for Object Detectioncited by 317
- 2021DSEC: A Stereo Event Camera Dataset for Driving Scenarioscited by 303
- 2023RoMa: Robust Dense Feature Matchingcited by 302
13 more
- 2022DKM: Dense Kernelized Feature Matching for Geometry Estimationcited by 177
- 2024Efficient LoFTR: Semi-Dense Local Feature Matching with Sparse-Like Speedcited by 120
- 2024OmniGlue: Generalizable Feature Matching with Foundation Model Guidancecited by 56
- 2025RoMa v2: Harder Better Faster Denser Feature Matchingcited by 51
- 2024XoFTR: Cross-modal Feature Matching Transformercited by 48
- 2024MINIMA: Modality Invariant Image Matchingcited by 47
- 2025Multi-view Reconstruction via SfM-guided Monocular Depth Estimationcited by 20
- 2026LoMa: Local Feature Matching Revisitedcited by 11
- 2026A Mixed Diet Makes DINO An Omnivorous Vision Encodercited by 4
- 2026MM-OVSeg:Multimodal Optical-SAR Fusion for Open-Vocabulary Segmentation in Remote Sensingcited by 4
- 2026SceneGlue: Scene-Aware Transformer for Feature Matching without Scene-Level Annotationcited by 2
- 2025Grid-Reg: Detector-Free Gridized Feature Learning and Matching for Large-Scale SAR-Optical Image Registrationcited by 1
- 2026AnyMatch: Supercharging Universal Multi-Modal Image Matching with Large-Scale Single-View Imagescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.