mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Do ResNets Route? Sparse Interaction Experts in Residual Networks

arXiv 2610.02907 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Residual networks execute every block for every input, yet their functional contributions need not be input independent. We formulate a trained ResNet as a set function over binary residual-branch masks and apply M"obius inversion to decompose its output exactly into individual residual corrections and higher-order interactions. For smooth residual stacks, we show that each fixed k-way interaction scales as O(λk) under residual scaling. Exhaustive analysis of ImageNet-pretrained ResNet-18 and ResNet-34 reveals that interaction mass peaks at orders five and ten, respectively, rather than at low orders. Reducing the residual scale shifts both spectra toward lower orders, but also changes model predictions. The interaction coefficients are concentrated in magnitude but not hard sparse, and prediction-preserving sparsity weakens with depth. Crucially, the dominant interactions vary across inputs and predicted classes around a shared global core, while their overall complexity changes little with sample difficulty. These results show that dense ResNets implement an implicit form of soft routing: every block is executed, but different inputs rely on different residual interaction experts. Routing can therefore emerge at the level of functional contribution without an explicit router or sparse execution.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 23 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

23 of 28 references.

References · 23

  1. 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
  2. 2014ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challengecited by 8,498
  3. 2017A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictionscited by 6,555
  4. 2017Outrageously Large Neural Networks: The Sparsely-Gated Mixture-of-Experts Layercited by 3,509
  5. 2021Switch Transformers: Scaling to Trillion Parameter Models with Simple and Efficient Sparsitycited by 3,073
  6. 2016Identity Mappings in Deep Residual Networkscited by 1,965
  7. 2020GShard: Scaling Giant Models with Conditional Computation and Automatic Shardingcited by 1,631
  8. 2016Deep Networks with Stochastic Depthcited by 979
  9. 2022Mixture-of-Experts with Expert Choice Routingcited by 623
  10. 2019Importance Estimation for Neural Network Pruningcited by 541
  11. 2022DeepSpeed-MoE: Advancing Mixture-of-Experts Inference and Training to Power Next-Generation AI Scalecited by 404
  12. 2017SkipNet: Learning Dynamic Routing in Convolutional Networkscited by 332
11 more
  1. 2021BASE Layers: Simplifying Training of Large, Sparse Modelscited by 320
  2. 2015Highway Networkscited by 260
  3. 2017BlockDrop: Dynamic Inference Paths in Residual Networkscited by 189
  4. 2022StableMoE: Stable Routing Strategy for Mixture of Expertscited by 100
  5. 2024shapiq: Shapley Interactions for Machine Learningcited by 43
  6. 2023HarsanyiNet: Computing Accurate Shapley Values in a Single Forward Propagationcited by 17
  7. 2024Learning to Understand: Identifying Interactions via the M"obius Transformcited by 13
  8. 2020Shapley Value as Principled Metric for Structured Network Pruningcited by 9
  9. 2016Learning Identity Mappings with Residual Gatescited by 6
  10. 2026Path-Constrained Mixture-of-Expertscited by 4
  11. 2016The Loss Surface of Residual Networks: Ensembles and the Role of Batch Normalizationcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.