On Unlearning for Time-series Forecasting
On the map: LLM safety and security → Machine unlearning
Abstract (arXiv)
Time-series forecasting is widely used in sensitive domains. Models in these settings are often trained on longitudinal user- or entity-level records, which may later require removal because they contain sensitive or proprietary information or have been corrupted by sensor failures. To address such deletion requests without costly retraining, machine unlearning has been widely studied as a practical mechanism for privacy protection and data governance. However, the application of machine unlearning to time series prediction has not yet been well realized; this is mainly due to the following unique challenges: Gradient-based unlearning can be unstable because a deleted observation participates in multiple causally connected forecasting windows, causing parameter updates to propagate beyond the requested interval and degrade retained forecasting utility. Label-guided updating offers a more controlled alternative, but continuous and context-dependent forecasts lack a suitable replacement target, while the exact-retrained output is unavailable during unlearning. Moreover, the remaining support for a deleted temporal pattern is highly non-uniform. Some affected windows retain structurally similar counterparts in the retained data, whereas others become underrepresented or isolated. We present RDTU, a Residual Diffusion framework for time-series unlearning. RDTU first uses a retained-set neural tangent kernel predictor to obtain a deletion-compatible base forecast. Then it quantifies the global and local structural support of each affected window using the volume contribution of the retained-reference data. Then a diffusion model generates a residual correction that estimates the counterfactual forecast, yielding a pseudo-label field that guides a lightweight model update. Experiments show that RDTU consistently produces unlearned models that most closely match exact retraining.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Machine unlearning, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.
Builds on
No reference list yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2026Retrieval Is Not Enough: Refreshing Memory for Frozen Time-Series Forecasters
- 2025Small but Mighty: Enhancing Time Series Forecasting with Lightweight LLMs
- 2026Tracing the Evidence Behind Zero-Shot Time-Series Forecasting: A Source-First Taxonomy and Audit Framework
- 2023Time-LLM: Time Series Forecasting by Reprogramming Large Language Models
- 2026RATL: Learning from Retrieved Residuals for Robust Multivariate Time-Series Forecasting
- 2026MEMTS: Internalizing Domain Knowledge via Parameterized Memory for Retrieval-Free Domain Adaptation of Time Series Foundation Models
- 2024Share Secrets for Privacy: Confidential Forecasting with Vertical Federated Learning
- 2026MemCast: Memory-Driven Time Series Forecasting with Experience-Conditioned Reasoning