mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Learning Query Encoders Can Be Hard Even When Vector Retrieval Is Geometrically Easy

arXiv 2610.02749 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.IR cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Efficient vector retrieval requires both a corpus geometry that supports retrieving the right documents through vector similarity, and a query encoder that can embed queries near their desired documents in the embedding space. Recent work has studied geometric capacity through the lens of the minimum embedding dimension needed to realize all top-k answer sets of n documents. We study a different notion of geometric capacity--the maximum recall achievable for a frozen document index--and explore whether learned query encoders can reach this ceiling. On several real-world retrieval benchmarks, we show that retrieval quality of single-vector query encoders often lies far below what the document indices can support. Motivated by this observation, we give theoretical evidence that learning query encoders can be computationally hard. In particular, we construct a retrieval task that (1) admits a query encoder with perfect recall which is representable by a small one-hidden-layer ReLU network, but (2) any statistical-query learner (a class capturing learners that access training data through aggregate statistics) provably requires exponentially many statistical queries to achieve non-trivial recall advantage over the random baseline k/n. Taken together, our results suggest substantial unrealized geometric capacity in retrieval benchmarks and establish query encoder learnability as a possible barrier in embedding-based retrieval.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 17 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

17 of 27 references.

References · 17

  1. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  2. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,297
  3. 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
  4. 2020Dense Passage Retrieval for Open-Domain Question Answeringcited by 3,824
  5. 2021BEIR: A Heterogenous Benchmark for Zero-shot Evaluation of Information Retrieval Modelscited by 1,252
  6. 2020ColBERT: Efficient and Effective Passage Search via Contextualized Late Interaction over BERTcited by 1,178
  7. 2024BRIGHT: A Realistic and Challenging Benchmark for Reasoning-Intensive Retrievalcited by 158
  8. 2016Statistical Query Lower Bounds for Robust Estimation of High-dimensional Gaussians and Gaussian Mixturescited by 115
  9. 2025On the Theoretical Limitations of Embedding-Based Retrievalcited by 104
  10. 2018Adversarial examples from computational constraintscited by 80
  11. 2020Superpolynomial Lower Bounds for Learning One-Layer Neural Networks using Gradient Descentcited by 58
  12. 2021On the Power of Differentiable Learning versus PAC and SQ Learningcited by 28
5 more
  1. 2022Hardness of Noise-Free Learning for Two-Hidden-Layer Neural Networkscited by 28
  2. 2016A General Characterization of the Statistical Query Complexitycited by 27
  3. 2017On the Complexity of Learning Neural Networkscited by 18
  4. 2026What Limits Does Quantization Place on Dense Top-k Retrieval? A Theoretical Studycited by 4
  5. 2026Is Dimensionality a Barrier for Retrieval Models?cited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.