mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Differential Privacy of Gradient Descent on Perturbed Objectives

arXiv 2610.02716 ↗First posted 2 Oct 2026cs.LG cs.CR stat.MLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Objective perturbation adds a random linear term to a regularized empirical risk and releases the exact perturbed minimizer. We study the finite computation obtained by releasing the N-th iterate of deterministic gradient descent on wmapsto F(w;S)+langle z,wrangle, where z~mathcal N(0,σ2Id) is drawn once before optimization. For strongly convex and smooth objectives with Lipschitz Hessian, we prove an explicit condition under which the map zmapsto wN is a C1-diffeomorphism on the bounded domains used in the privacy argument, with a quantitative lower bound on the smallest singular value of its Jacobian. This permits a direct change-of-variables analysis of the finite iterate. For generalized linear models, the resulting privacy-profile bound has no explicit ambient-dimension factor once the iteration condition holds, and its finite-iteration correction decreases geometrically. By letting the free truncation parameter grow slowly with N, we recover the corresponding exact-minimizer certificate in the limit. We also bound the expected excess empirical risk by dσ2/(2μ) plus a geometrically decreasing optimization term, and transfer the result to population risk without an additional multiplicative condition-number factor in the leading statistical terms.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 30 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Oct 2026.

Builds on

13 of 30 references.

References · 13

  1. 2018Privacy Amplification by Subsampling: Tight Analyses via Couplings and Divergencescited by 242
  2. 2019Private Stochastic Convex Optimization with Optimal Ratescited by 186
  3. 2020Private Stochastic Convex Optimization: Optimal Rates in Linear Timecited by 153
  4. 2018The Limit Points of (Optimistic) Gradient Descent in Min-Max Optimizationcited by 101
  5. 2018Privacy Amplification by Iterationcited by 100
  6. 2021Differential Privacy Dynamics of Langevin Diffusion and Noisy Gradient Descentcited by 73
  7. 2022Differentially Private Learning Needs Hidden State (Or Much Faster Convergence)cited by 48
  8. 2024Shifted Interpolation for Differential Privacycited by 13
  9. 2023Improving the Privacy and Practicality of Objective Perturbation for Differentially Private Linear Learnerscited by 12
  10. 2024Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimationcited by 12
  11. 2024Convergent Privacy Loss of Noisy-SGD without Convexity and Smoothnesscited by 8
  12. 2025Bilevel gradient methods and the Morse parametric qualification conditioncited by 2
1 more
  1. 2026Quadratic Objective Perturbation: Curvature-Based Differential Privacycited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.