DeepStratNet: A Context-Aware Coordinate Regression Framework for Seismic Horizon Tracking under Sparse Labels
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Automatic horizon tracking is a foundational task in 3D seismic interpretation. Most existing deep learning approaches formulate it as dense semantic segmentation, typically using U-Net-based architectures. The model produces a probability map over all pixels that must be post-processed to extract precise horizon coordinates, while horizon picks in time/depth must be converted into dense masks for training. Unpicked seismic traces are consequently treated as background, which can hinder convergence, and both pre- and post-processing can introduce errors into the final interpretation. Moreover, 2D segmentation models do not inherently capture inter-slice context, while 3D models are often computationally prohibitive. We instead formulate horizon tracking as a bounded coordinate regression problem, where the model directly predicts the time/depth coordinate of the target horizon at each lateral position. We propose a lightweight regression head compatible with any pretrained vision backbone, coupled with an LSTM module to model inter-slice context and produce a continuous horizon surface across the volume. A combination of L1 and L2 losses supervises predictions at valid horizon picks, while a geology-informed regularization enforces lateral continuity between successive traces. Under controlled experimental conditions, we evaluate four pretrained vision backbones under both segmentation and regression configurations on a seismic volume from New Zealand. The proposed approach consistently outperforms its segmentation counterparts quantitatively, using metrics including RMSE and PCC, and qualitatively, while also demonstrating greater robustness to increasing sparsity of training picks. Finally, we show that prediction variation across successive traces captures local variations in geological complexity, providing an automated quality control measure for downstream seismic interpretation.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 9 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
9 of 26 references.
References · 9
- 2015Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognitioncited by 52,096
- 2020An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scalecited by 30,186
- 2022A ConvNet for the 2020scited by 3,579
- 2017Rethinking Atrous Convolution for Semantic Image Segmentationcited by 2,161
- 2018Object Detection with Deep Learning: A Reviewcited by 528
- 2018CURE-OR: Challenging Unreal and Real Environments for Object Recognitioncited by 19
- 2023Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classificationcited by 9
- 2018Multi-resolution neural networks for tracking seismic horizons from few training imagescited by 4
- 2026Domain-Guided Prompting of the Segment Anything Model for Seismic Interpretation: The Role of Attributes, Visualization, and Hybrid Promptscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.