mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

MIRROR: Multipath Quorum Integrity for LLM Multi-Agent Communication

arXiv 2610.02349 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.CR cs.AI cs.MAcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Agent threats, guardrails and governance

Abstract (arXiv)

Inter-agent communication is central to Large Language Model Multi-Agent Systems (LLM-MAS), but it introduces an underexplored vulnerability: Agent-in-the-Middle (AiTM) attacks that manipulate messages in transit without compromising the agents themselves. Prior work reports Attack Success Rates (ASR) approaching 100% on structured tasks. Existing defenses rely on semantic validation, which requires additional inference and can block benign outputs, or on transport-layer encryption, which does not help when an intermediary legitimately terminates TLS. We present MIRROR, a communication-layer integrity primitive that replicates a single canonicalized payload across k logical routes and accepts a message only when a strict majority of routes report the same digest. MIRROR uses unkeyed hashing and so authenticates nothing on its own, since an active on-path adversary can always recompute a digest over a payload it has modified. All integrity derives from the assumption that honest routes form a majority. The digest serves only to make witness routes constant-size and to bind the recovered payload to the quorum-agreed value under second-preimage resistance. We give the guarantee under a route-compromise bound alpha < 0.5, and extend it to correlated routes, where the quantity that matters is the size of the largest shared-failure group and not the route count. We further show that availability and integrity degrade at the same threshold: below alpha = 0.5, quorum-denial and message-dropping adversaries cannot block honest traffic. Across MMLU, HumanEval, and MBPP on two frameworks and four communication topologies, and in a MetaGPT deployment against a production API, MIRROR reduces ASR to 0% below the threshold at 1x LLM token cost. LLM-as-a-Judge costs 35x in the same deployment, and blocks up to 44.2% of benign outputs in the topology sweep.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Agent threats, guardrails and governance, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

No reference list yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Trust propagation and structural containment in Multi-agent LLM pipelines
  2. 2026Early Detection of Distributed Backdoors in Multi-Agent LLM Systems: A Characterization Study
  3. 2026The Same Zero: Why Identical ASR Can Imply Different Guarantees in LLM-Agent Security
  4. 2026The Proxy Knows Too Much: Sealing LLM API Routers with Attested TEEs
  5. 2026Rewriting the Response Path: Silent Tampering and Provider-Signed Defense in BYOK LLM Agents
  6. 2026S-Bus: Automatic Read-Set Reconstruction for Multi-Agent LLM State Coordination
  7. 2026Breaking the Protocol: Security Analysis of the Model Context Protocol Specification and Prompt Injection Vulnerabilities in Tool-Integrated LLM Agents
  8. 2026Certified Multi-Source Integrity for Structured Agent Actions