Physics-Refined Spatiotemporal Forecasting on Open-Boundary Hydrologic Graphs
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Spatiotemporal forecasting on hydrologic graphs is especially prone to instability in open-boundary systems, where the forecast domain exchanges fluxes with an unobserved exterior. In such systems, boundary nodes receive external forcing, e.g., upstream inflows in rivers or tidal signals in coastal regions, that is typically unavailable at prediction time. The absence of this information can compound errors as forecasts unfold in an autoregressive fashion, leading to inferior long-horizon performance. This paper dissects this instability issue by exploring two questions. 1) What boundary forcing enters the forecast domain when information beyond the boundary is missing? 2) How should this forcing propagate through the domain without incurring error amplification under autoregressive rollout? To address both, we propose a new computing framework comprising two key components. First, to compensate for the boundary forcing, our framework learns ghost node proxies from the boundary and interior nodes, striving to approximate unobserved external inputs. Second, to control error accumulation from these learned proxies, we leverage two physics refiners. In particular, one refiner enforces local consistency by aligning ghost proxies with their two-hop neighbors (i.e., boundary nodes and their immediate interiors). The other refiner enhances global stability by correcting the model forecasts through a physics-guided graph neural operator, reducing long-horizon numerical drift. Two real-world hydrologic graphs are employed for empirical evaluation. Comparative results show that our proposal enjoys higher prediction accuracy and long-horizon stability over both learning-based and physics-informed model competitors.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
16 of 36 references.
References · 16
- 2020Learning Mesh-Based Simulation with Graph Networkscited by 840
- 2019Graph WaveNet for Deep Spatial-Temporal Graph Modelingcited by 820
- 2023PDE-Refiner: Achieving Accurate Long Rollouts with Neural PDE Solverscited by 205
- 2019Graph Neural Ordinary Differential Equationscited by 153
- 2023Towards Stability of Autoregressive Neural Operatorscited by 54
- 2017Graph Classification via Deep Learning with Virtual Nodescited by 30
- 2024Long Range Propagation on Continuous-Time Dynamic Graphscited by 26
- 2024PhyMPGN: Physics-encoded Message Passing Graph Network for spatiotemporal PDE systemscited by 18
- 2021Conditionally Parameterized, Discretization-Aware Neural Networks for Mesh-Based Modeling of Physical Systemscited by 16
- 2024State Space Models on Temporal Graphs: A First-Principles Studycited by 16
- 2024The Merit of River Network Topology for Neural Flood Forecastingcited by 12
- 2025PhysicsCorrect: A Training-Free Approach for Stable Neural PDE Simulationscited by 8
4 more
- 2025Mixture of neural operator experts for learning boundary conditions and model selectioncited by 3
- 2025Topology-aware Neural Flux Prediction Guided by Physicscited by 2
- 2025DUALFloodGNN: Physics-informed Graph Neural Network for Operational Flood Modelingcited by 2
- 2025HydroGAT: Distributed Heterogeneous Graph Attention Transformer for Spatiotemporal Flood Predictioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.