mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Zero Flux: Flow-Based Comparison of High-Dimensional Discrete Distributions

arXiv 2610.01472 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026stat.ML cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Comparing two high-dimensional discrete distributions has always been a challenging task due to the exponentially growing state space and complex changes in interactions. A recent work suggests comparing distributions through a vector field trained using flow matching between two continuous distributions. The resulting vector field at mid-point vanishes if and only if two distributions identical. However, such a flow-based criterion does not naturally apply to discrete distributions. We extend this principle to the discrete domain and introduce the Zero Flux criterion, a discrepancy based on local probability fluxes. Under independent coupling, we show that all local probability fluxes vanish at the midpoint if and only if two distributions are the same. This discrepancy decomposes the joint distributional difference into smaller, local contributions and can be efficiently estimated from samples. We establish finite sample error bounds for our estimator. Experiments on synthetic and real categorical data demonstrate reliable recovery of sparse dependence signals and stable tracking of distribution shifts in high dimensions.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 16 of its 28 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

16 of 28 references.

References · 16

  1. 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,426
  2. 2022Flow Straight and Fast: Learning to Generate and Transfer Data with Rectified Flowcited by 3,550
  3. 2015Importance Weighted Autoencoderscited by 454
  4. 2024Discrete Flow Matchingcited by 301
  5. 2024Generative Flows on Discrete State-Spaces: Enabling Multimodal Flows with Applications to Protein Co-Designcited by 294
  6. 2016Revisiting Classifier Two-Sample Testscited by 258
  7. 2022Concrete Score Matching: Generalized Score Matching for Discrete Datacited by 144
  8. 2020Learning Deep Kernels for Non-Parametric Two-Sample Testscited by 129
  9. 2016Classification accuracy as a proxy for two sample testingcited by 39
  10. 2023MMD-FUSE: Learning and Combining Kernels for Two-Sample Testing Without Data Splittingcited by 33
  11. 2020Log-Likelihood Ratio Minimizing Flows: Towards Robust and Quantifiable Neural Distribution Alignmentcited by 10
  12. 2023Minimax optimal testing by classificationcited by 4
4 more
  1. 2026Zero-Flow Encoderscited by 4
  2. 2023Distance Estimation for High-Dimensional Discrete Distributionscited by 3
  3. 2026Midpoint Generative Modelscited by 2
  4. 2026Zero-Flow Two-Sample Testscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2024Minibatch Optimal Transport and Perplexity Bound Estimation in Discrete Flow Matching
  2. 2026Discrete Flow Matching: Convergence Guarantees Under Minimal Assumptions
  3. 2025On The Hidden Biases of Flow Matching Samplers
  4. 2025Distillation of Discrete Diffusion by Exact Conditional Distribution Matching
  5. 2024Flow matching achieves almost minimax optimal convergence
  6. 2025α-Flow: A Unified Framework for Continuous-State Discrete Flow Matching Models
  7. 2025Distribution estimation via Flow Matching with Lipschitz guarantees
  8. 2026Binomial flows: Denoising and flow matching for discrete ordinal data