mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Revision-Aware Independent Agent Graphs for Dynamic Reasoning

arXiv 2610.01249 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.AI cs.CLcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Conventional reasoning protocols present a fixed, preselected task, so they cannot test whether an agent propagates relevant updates, preserves unaffected work, or reconstructs a historical task binding. We therefore study dynamic task routing, in which an event stream revises task bindings and a system must select the document version valid at each query time before solving it. To study this problem, we repurpose six widely used benchmarks: MMLU, MMLU-Pro, MedMCQA, MATH, GPQA, and HumanEval into 31,119 dynamic episodes comprising 373,428 temporally categorized queries. This setting exposes a central trade-off: recomputing after every event wastes work, whereas unguarded reuse returns stale conclusions. We introduce the Revision-Aware Independent Agent Graph (RIAG), a bounded multi-agent policy that separates deterministic temporal resolution from task reasoning. RIAG caches solutions by immutable document identity, starts each fresh task with two unexposed attempts, and conditionally invokes audit and repair, using at most four calls per document version. On this collection, homogeneous RIAG achieves 54.24% joint routing-and-answer accuracy at 0.62 calls/query, compared with 32.22% at 18.00 calls/query for the strongest comparison method; heterogeneous RIAG reaches 49.78% at 0.63 calls/query.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

25 of 27 references.

References · 25

  1. 2019Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings using Siamese BERT-Networkscited by 9,049
  2. 2021Evaluating Large Language Models Trained on Codecited by 8,053
  3. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,768
  4. 2022Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language Modelscited by 5,601
  5. 2021Measuring Mathematical Problem Solving With the MATH Datasetcited by 5,203
  6. 2024Qwen2.5 Technical Reportcited by 4,713
  7. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  8. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  9. 2023Self-Refine: Iterative Refinement with Self-Feedbackcited by 3,317
  10. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,841
  11. 2023GPQA: A Graduate-Level Google-Proof Q&A Benchmarkcited by 2,748
  12. 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,081
13 more
  1. 2024MMLU-Pro: A More Robust and Challenging Multi-Task Language Understanding Benchmarkcited by 1,758
  2. 2023Improving Factuality and Reasoning in Language Models through Multiagent Debatecited by 1,739
  3. 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,628
  4. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  5. 2023AgentBench: Evaluating LLMs as Agentscited by 1,211
  6. 2024Qwen2.5-Coder Technical Reportcited by 1,151
  7. 2022MedMCQA : A Large-scale Multi-Subject Multi-Choice Dataset for Medical domain Question Answeringcited by 525
  8. 2024Mixture-of-Agents Enhances Large Language Model Capabilitiescited by 420
  9. 2024AFlow: Automating Agentic Workflow Generationcited by 395
  10. 2024AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agentscited by 319
  11. 2023ReConcile: Round-Table Conference Improves Reasoning via Consensus among Diverse LLMscited by 297
  12. 2025Rethinking Mixture-of-Agents: Is Mixing Different Large Language Models Beneficial?cited by 52
  13. 2026Graph-of-Agents: A Graph-based Framework for Multi-Agent LLM Collaborationcited by 15

Built on by

Not cited yet.