Persistent Depth Ordering amid Shifting Block-Bypass Responses in Language Model Pretraining
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Layer interventions are widely used to probe the internal organization of language models, yet most analyses examine a single training checkpoint even though model representations and computations evolve throughout pretraining. This leaves open which depth-dependent intervention responses reflect persistent organization and which are transient consequences of training. We study this question using single-block identity bypass on fixed teacher-forced contexts across five released trajectories and 11 model-domain combinations. We find that block-bypass responses retain recognizable depth ordering while their magnitudes redistribute: nearby checkpoints preserve stronger rank correspondence than distant ones, and large changes concentrate at positions that recur across text samples and transfer across evaluation domains. Controlled experiments further show that changes in the natural bypass effect cannot be reduced to a single downstream sensitivity: in replicated Pythia runs, local missing-update magnitude grows while the pooled matched downstream response decreases, whereas OLMo-2 7B exhibits a different balance. These matched responses also depend on perturbation strength and direction, without identifying targeted compensation. Together, our results show that longitudinal layer sensitivity is structured but not static, and that single-checkpoint intervention responses should be interpreted in the context of how the underlying perturbation pathway evolves during training.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.
Builds on
20 of 24 references.
References · 20
- 2021Training Verifiers to Solve Math Word Problemscited by 9,743
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,018
- 2021Program Synthesis with Large Language Modelscited by 3,509
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 2,992
- 2023Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and Scalingcited by 1,734
- 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
- 2024ShortGPT: Layers in Large Language Models are More Redundant Than You Expectcited by 369
- 2023Towards Best Practices of Activation Patching in Language Models: Metrics and Methodscited by 328
- 2025SmolLM2: When Smol Goes Big -- Data-Centric Training of a Small Language Modelcited by 307
- 20242 OLMo 2 Furiouscited by 302
- 2024The Unreasonable Ineffectiveness of the Deeper Layerscited by 219
- 2024The Remarkable Robustness of LLMs: Stages of Inference?cited by 138
8 more
- 2023Is This the Subspace You Are Looking for? An Interpretability Illusion for Subspace Activation Patchingcited by 75
- 2024LLM Circuit Analyses Are Consistent Across Training and Scalecited by 60
- 2024Explorations of Self-Repair in Language Modelscited by 35
- 2024Investigating Layer Importance in Large Language Modelscited by 35
- 2025Layer Importance for Mathematical Reasoning is Forged in Pre-Training and Invariant after Post-Trainingcited by 9
- 2025Crosscoding Through Time: Tracking Emergence & Consolidation Of Linguistic Representations Throughout LLM Pretrainingcited by 6
- 2023Divergent Token Metrics: Measuring degradation to prune away LLM components -- and optimize quantizationcited by 4
- 2026No Free Swap: Protocol-Dependent Layer Redundancy in Transformerscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.