mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Neural scaling laws and evolution of learnable activation functions of Kolmogorov-Arnold networks

arXiv 2610.00985 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs) represent a compelling alternative to traditional Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP)-based neural networks. By employing activation functions as learnable elements, KANs offer superior interpretability, making them suited for scientific domains. In this work, we investigate the neural scaling laws of KANs and the structural evolution of their learnable activation functions under dataset expansion. Specifically, we evaluate the scaling behavior of three KAN variants---BSRBF-KAN, Gottlieb-KAN, and Faster-KAN---across standard image classification benchmarks (MNIST and Fashion-MNIST) and a specialized scientific regression task (magnetic parameter estimation from domain images of moir'e magnetic textures). Our results demonstrate that the test loss cal L exhibits a broken neural scaling law (BNSL) behavior as a function of the dataset size ND. After passing through a random-guess regime, the loss follows architecture- and task-dependent scaling behavior. The loss crosses from a faster- to a slower-scaling branch, cal Lpropto ND-α and cal Lpropto ND-β with α>β for image classification tasks. The exponents α and β depend strongly on both the specific network architecture and the dataset-size regime, ranging from 0.4 to 1.5 and from 0.06 to 0.6, respectively. For the magnetic parameter-regression task, the loss follows a single scaling law with its exponent ranging from 1.28 to 2.59. Additionally, we provide a structural analysis of how activation functions refine their complexity as data volume increases, finding that dataset expansion drives a transition from simple linear-like approximations toward stable, interpretable symbolic forms. These findings provide a quantitative roadmap for the efficient application of KANs while managing the trade-off between model expressivity and computational overhead.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 12 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

12 of 27 references.

References · 12

  1. 2019PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Librarycited by 20,160
  2. 2020Scaling Laws for Neural Language Modelscited by 6,411
  3. 2017Fashion-MNIST: a Novel Image Dataset for Benchmarking Machine Learning Algorithmscited by 4,283
  4. 2022Training Compute-Optimal Large Language Modelscited by 2,927
  5. 2018Graph Neural Networks: A Review of Methods and Applicationscited by 1,571
  6. 2021Explaining Neural Scaling Lawscited by 353
  7. 2022A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Lawscited by 101
  8. 20244+3 Phases of Compute-Optimal Neural Scaling Lawscited by 66
  9. 2024BSRBF-KAN: A combination of B-splines and Radial Basis Functions in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networkscited by 43
  10. 2024Exploring the Potential of Polynomial Basis Functions in Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks: A Comparative Study of Different Groups of Polynomialscited by 33
  11. 2024Dimension-free deterministic equivalents and scaling laws for random feature regressioncited by 23
  12. 2025Neural Scaling Laws for Deep Regressioncited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.