mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

The Other Half of Workflow Portability: Evidence-Backed HPC Site Profiles with Agentic Discovery

arXiv 2610.00971 ↗First posted 1 Oct 2026cs.DC cs.IRcited by 0

On the map: LLM agents and tool use → Software engineering coding agents

Abstract (arXiv)

Moving a workflow developed and tested at one HPC site to another rarely succeeds without some amount of trial and error. Package managers rebuild software environments, containers ship whole filesystems, and workflow specifications such as backpacks package a workflow with its software, data, and resource requirements. These approaches address one half of workflow portability: what a workflow needs. But none describes how a given HPC site must be used, and that missing half is why even a portable workflow requires manual adjustment at each new site. That gap includes the site's resource shape, storage configuration, network permissions, and operating policies. This information may be explicit in the batch system, hidden in the prose of documentation, or buried deep within a router's configuration, making it difficult for an automated deployment tool to turn site knowledge into useful deployment decisions. We propose the HPC site profile, a structured, evidence-backed document that makes this knowledge actionable. We automatically construct it in three steps that mirror where the information lives: measuring the login node, extracting typed fields from documentation with a bounded language-model agent, and submitting pilot jobs for eligible unresolved fields. Every field is verified against its evidence or discarded, so a rule, not the model, decides what enters the profile. The profile then preflights a workflow into an execution plan or an early, explainable failure. We build profiles at Purdue Anvil, TACC Stampede3, and Notre Dame CRC and present a case study of preflighting a real workflow.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Software engineering coding agents, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 9 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 1 Oct 2026.

Builds on

9 of 27 references.

References · 9

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  4. 2019Parsl: Pervasive Parallel Programming in Pythoncited by 36
  5. 2024Reproducibility, Replicability, and Repeatability: A survey of reproducible research with a focus on high performance computingcited by 8
  6. 2022Detecting Outdated Code Element References in Software Repository Documentationcited by 5
  7. 2022Predicting batch queue job wait times for informed scheduling of urgent HPC workloadscited by 4
  8. 2024Workflows Community Summit 2024: Future Trends and Challenges in Scientific Workflowscited by 3
  9. 2023PSI/J: A Portable Interface for Submitting, Monitoring, and Managing Jobscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization
  2. 2026LegacyWorld: Atomicity-Aware Evaluation of GUI Agents for Legacy Workflows
  3. 2026Natural-Language Workflows Are Not Software Yet: Artifact-Driven Compilation for Reliable Agent Execution
  4. 2026Serving Agentic Workflows with a Physical-Plan Compiler and Adaptive Runtime
  5. 2026Specifying and Maintaining Agentic Workflows: An Empirical Study of GitHub Agentic Workflows
  6. 2026WorkflowPerturb: Calibrated Stress Tests for Evaluating Multi-Agent Workflow Metrics
  7. 2026An Agentic Approach Towards Replication Package Quality Evaluation
  8. 2026MetaRoute-Bench: Evaluating Meta-Decision Policies for Agentic Workflow Routing