Contextual trajectory and incremental contextual displacement: Towards using LLMs to understand dynamic, utterance-specific meaning construction
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Transformer-based large language models (LLMs) such as RoBERTa represent text using contextual word embeddings (CWEs), which alter the embeddings associated with each token based on surrounding context. We construct token-wise incremental trajectories by repeatedly recomputing a token's CWE as successive words are added to a sentence, yielding a representation of how contextualized embeddings evolve as the utterance unfolds. We evaluate this approach using garden-path sentences as a test case with characteristic features. Token-wise trajectories reproduce known features of garden-path processing, including disruption around the critical region, and reliably distinguish garden-path sentences from matched disambiguated controls. We introduce several metrics for quantifying representational displacement across contextual increments and show that trajectory information can be highly predictive of sentence type. We find that ambiguity-related information is recoverable not only from the sentence-level CLS representation but also from ordinary vocabulary tokens, suggesting that utterance-level information is distributed across multiple representational scales. In exploratory analyses, we find qualitatively similar trajectory structures in other ambiguity- and misdirection-related linguistic phenomena. Together, these results establish token-wise incremental trajectories as a promising framework for studying utterance-specific meaning construction using LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 22 of its 61 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
22 of 61 references.
References · 22
- 2019Exploring the Limits of Transfer Learning with a Unified Text-to-Text Transformercited by 14,599
- 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
- 2013Efficient Estimation of Word Representations in Vector Spacecited by 4,375
- 2019DistilBERT, a distilled version of BERT: smaller, faster, cheaper and lightercited by 4,307
- 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
- 2020DeBERTa: Decoding-enhanced BERT with Disentangled Attentioncited by 2,181
- 2023Embers of Autoregression: Understanding Large Language Models Through the Problem They are Trained to Solvecited by 178
- 2024Does Prompt Formatting Have Any Impact on LLM Performance?cited by 141
- 2019Neural Language Models as Psycholinguistic Subjects: Representations of Syntactic Statecited by 138
- 2019Does BERT Make Any Sense? Interpretable Word Sense Disambiguation with Contextualized Embeddingscited by 56
- 2023Dissociating language and thought in large language modelscited by 29
- 2025What is a Number, That a Large Language Model May Know It?cited by 15
10 more
- 2024Incremental Comprehension of Garden-Path Sentences by Large Language Models: Semantic Interpretation, Syntactic Re-Analysis, and Attentioncited by 11
- 2024Tokens, the oft-overlooked appetizer: Large language models, the distributional hypothesis, and meaningcited by 4
- 2023Lexinvariant Language Modelscited by 3
- 2024Quantifying Lexical Semantic Shift via Unbalanced Optimal Transportcited by 3
- 2026Stories in Space: In-Context Learning Trajectories in Conceptual Belief Spacecited by 3
- 2025Practical and Ready-to-Use Methodology to Assess the re-identification Risk in Anonymized Datasetscited by 2
- 2026The Last Fingerprint: How Markdown Training Shapes LLM Prosecited by 2
- 2018Improving the Coverage and the Generalization Ability of Neural Word Sense Disambiguation through Hypernymy and Hyponymy Relationshipscited by 1
- 2026Revisiting Real-Time Digging-In Effects: No Evidence from NP/Z Garden-Pathscited by 1
- 2026LLMs are not stochastic parrots: Evidence for meaning-mediated abstraction from conlang-like taskscited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.