mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

Group-Invariant Statistics Determine Embedding Geometry: Harmonic Analysis of Representations from Bach to the Night Sky

arXiv 2610.00647 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The representations that language models learn for concepts such as months, weekdays, and places display consistent geometric structure: circles and saddle-shaped "Pringle" manifolds. Recent work traced these structures to textittranslation symmetry in word co-occurrence statistics, deriving the observed Fourier geometry when co-occurrence depends only on distance on an abelian lattice of concepts. We demonstrate that more general notions of symmetry lead to equally structured predictions. Considering symmetries defined by arbitrary finite groups, compact groups, and homogeneous spaces, we prove that whenever the co-occurrence statistics of a word family are invariant under a group G, the learned word embeddings consist of matrix elements of the irreducible representations (irreps) of G. Circles and Pringles arise when G is cyclic, in which case the irreps are Fourier modes. We verify the irrep structure in three experimental settings. (i) The cyclic group mathbbZ12: for the months of the year we recover the known circular geometry. (ii) A dihedral group acting on the major and minor triads: we unify two classical observations -- that transposition and chord inversion form a group (T/I) acting on chords (music theory), which textitimplies that the well-known "circle of fifths" emerges in learned chord embeddings (machine learning). (iii) We explain and reproduce a recently discovered spherical representation of celestial objects in large language models (LLMs) as a spherical-harmonic embedding derived from our theory. Our results demonstrate that the geometry of learned representations is often a consequence of the statistical symmetry of underlying data.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 11 of its 19 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

11 of 19 references.

References · 11

  1. 2023Progress measures for grokking via mechanistic interpretabilitycited by 822
  2. 2023The Linear Representation Hypothesis and the Geometry of Large Language Modelscited by 679
  3. 2023Language Models Represent Space and Timecited by 306
  4. 2024Not All Language Model Features Are One-Dimensionally Linearcited by 201
  5. 2024The Geometry of Categorical and Hierarchical Concepts in Large Language Modelscited by 151
  6. 2023A Toy Model of Universality: Reverse Engineering How Networks Learn Group Operationscited by 141
  7. 2026Symmetry in language statistics shapes the geometry of model representationscited by 20
  8. 2025Closed-Form Training Dynamics Reveal Learned Features and Linear Structure in Word2Vec-like Modelscited by 7
  9. 2026Sequential Group Composition: A Window into the Mechanics of Deep Learningcited by 7
  10. 2021Chord Embeddings: Analyzing What They Capture and Their Role for Next Chord Prediction and Artist Attribute Predictioncited by 4
  11. 2026Modeling Stylistic Co-evolution in Symbolic Music Heritage Collectionscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.