mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

From Task Mixtures to Specialized Experts

arXiv 2610.00580 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

In collaborative foundation model fine-tuning, client data is rarely homogeneous. Instead, clients typically possess unknown mixtures of distinct data distributions, or tasks. Conventional federated learning primarily addresses heterogeneity across clients without explicitly resolving latent task mixtures within each client. We study this setting as compound heterogeneity, where data is heterogeneous both across and within clients. We study adaptation over a common frozen representation and show that, when tasks share the same feature geometry, the optimal model for a client's task mixture under squared loss is a convex combination of the optimal models for its underlying tasks. Thus, a single locally trained model represents the client's overall task mixture, while individual inputs may be drawn from different underlying task distributions. This motivates routing inputs to specialized experts, and we show that, when the task optima form a simplex, task-aligned routing achieves lower risk than any single adapted model for genuinely mixed clients. With access to a small set of task-labeled public samples, we derive a convex program to recover task experts and match them to their corresponding tasks. Our routing analysis shows that effective specialization requires input-dependent expert selection aligned with each client's task mixture. Motivated by this analysis, we propose FedSEE. Across our experiments, FedSEE avoids the negative transfer observed in the evaluated baselines and improves performance by 2.9 points overall and 3.7 points for the worst-served quartile.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 6 of its 36 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

6 of 36 references.

References · 6

  1. 2019RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approachcited by 13,372
  2. 2020Adaptive Personalized Federated Learningcited by 358
  3. 2020Three Approaches for Personalization with Applications to Federated Learningcited by 325
  4. 2025Decouple and Orthogonalize: A Data-Free Framework for LoRA Mergingcited by 18
  5. 2026The Myth of Expert Specialization in MoEs: Why Routing Reflects Geometry, Not Necessarily Domain Expertisecited by 13
  6. 2025Communication-Efficient and Accurate Approach for Aggregation in Federated Low-Rank Adaptationcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.