mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

High-Value Synthetic Supervision for Parameter-Efficient Adaptation of a Compact Japanese Speech Model

arXiv 2610.00026 ↗First posted 2 Sep 2026cs.SD cs.CL cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Private domain speech is difficult to collect and redistribute, while compact models need task-specific supervision. We study an auditable synthetic pipeline that maps Japanese care handoffs directly to six-field structured notes. Using 182 synthetic training and development clips, we adapt a 1.47B audio model by full fine-tuning and rank-16 LoRA. On a 39-clip scenario-seed-disjoint synthetic test, an unadapted model obtains a model-judged factuality-recall score of 0.0500, full tuning 0.8664, and LoRA 0.8461. LoRA reaches 97.7% of the full-tuning aggregate as a descriptive ratio while project telemetry reports 12.4M trainable parameters, about 0.85% of the backbone. Both adaptations show large paired gains over the same base; the full-versus-LoRA interval crosses zero, and differing optimization settings preclude an equivalence claim. This is a parameter-efficient capability-acquisition result, not a device-performance result: latency, memory, energy, and real-time factor were not measured. All evaluation speech and targets are synthetic, references are model-proposed, and the judge is uncalibrated. The evidence shows that a compact model can acquire a narrow audio-to-structure transformation from a few hundred provenance-linked synthetic examples; it does not establish clinical validity, real-speech transfer, or superiority to a clean cloud system.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 5 of its 9 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 2 Sep 2026.

Builds on

5 of 9 references.

References · 5

  1. 2024Distilling an End-to-End Voice Assistant Without Instruction Training Datacited by 35
  2. 2025LFM2 Technical Reportcited by 31
  3. 2025Mind the Gap! Static and Interactive Evaluations of Large Audio Modelscited by 8
  4. 2024Incubating Text Classifiers Following User Instruction with Nothing but LLMcited by 6
  5. 2024Open-world Multi-label Text Classification with Extremely Weak Supervisioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.