mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CodeMimicry: Exploiting Safety Generalization Lag in Large Language Models via Structured Code Completion

arXiv 2609.39902 ↗First posted 30 Sep 2026cs.CR cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation → Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks

also in 1 more
Abstract (arXiv)

Large language models have achieved remarkable capabilities across diverse domains, yet their safety alignment remains vulnerable to jailbreak attacks. In this work, we identify a previously underexplored failure mode - safety generalization lag - where alignment trained predominantly on natural language fails to transfer to the code domain. We show that this lag induces a code-completion blind spot, allowing malicious intent embedded within syntactically valid code to evade safety mechanisms. To exploit this vulnerability, we propose CodeMimicry, a fully automated black-box jailbreak framework that generates structured, object-oriented code prompts to induce harmful outputs via code completion. Experiments on 8 state-of-the-art commercial LLMs demonstrate that CodeMimicry achieves a 96.25% attack success rate with 1.51 queries on average, significantly outperforming both template-based and optimization-based baselines. Beyond empirical performance, we provide a mechanistic analysis of code-based jailbreaks through latent space representations, including projection onto refusal-related directions and activation steering. This analysis offers an explanation of how CodeMimicry bypasses safety mechanisms in code-related domains. Our findings reveal a weakness in current safety alignment and highlight the need for robust alignments in structured domains such as code.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Safety alignment and jailbreak attacks, one of 10 directions in LLM alignment / RLHF / preference optimisation. Builds on 30 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.

Builds on

30 of 33 references.

Closest ancestors · 4

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2023Fine-tuning Aligned Language Models Compromises Safety, Even When Users Do Not Intend To!5 Oct
  2. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Models3 Oct
  3. 2023Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models1 Sep
  4. 2023GPT-4 Is Too Smart To Be Safe: Stealthy Chat with LLMs via Cipher12 Aug

Other references · 26

  1. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,393
  2. 2021Finetuned Language Models Are Zero-Shot Learnerscited by 3,747
  3. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,565
  4. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusalcited by 1,330
  5. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,326
  6. 2024DeepSeek-Coder: When the Large Language Model Meets Programming -- The Rise of Code Intelligencecited by 1,154
  7. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,124
  8. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 619
  9. 2024A StrongREJECT for Empty Jailbreakscited by 352
  10. 2024INSIDE: LLMs' Internal States Retain the Power of Hallucination Detectioncited by 317
  11. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 302
  12. 2023A Wolf in Sheep's Clothing: Generalized Nested Jailbreak Prompts can Fool Large Language Models Easilycited by 242
14 more
  1. 2024ArtPrompt: ASCII Art-based Jailbreak Attacks against Aligned LLMscited by 197
  2. 2024AutoDAN-Turbo: A Lifelong Agent for Strategy Self-Exploration to Jailbreak LLMscited by 185
  3. 2025SafeChain: Safety of Language Models with Long Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Capabilitiescited by 133
  4. 2024Making Them Ask and Answer: Jailbreaking Large Language Models in Few Queries via Disguise and Reconstructioncited by 95
  5. 2024FlipAttack: Jailbreak LLMs via Flippingcited by 73
  6. 2023Split and Merge: Aligning Position Biases in LLM-based Evaluatorscited by 71
  7. 2024CodeAttack: Revealing Safety Generalization Challenges of Large Language Models via Code Completioncited by 70
  8. 2024CodeChameleon: Personalized Encryption Framework for Jailbreaking Large Language Modelscited by 65
  9. 2024SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Mannercited by 57
  10. 2024Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspectivecited by 44
  11. 2025SAFEPATH: Preventing Harmful Reasoning in Chain-of-Thought via Early Alignmentcited by 24
  12. 2024Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Symbolic Mathematicscited by 14
  13. 2025Graph of Attacks with Pruning: Optimizing Stealthy Jailbreak Prompt Generation for Enhanced LLM Content Moderationcited by 9
  14. 2025EquaCode: A Multi-Strategy Jailbreak Approach for Large Language Models via Equation Solving and Code Completioncited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Grammar-Constrained Decoding Can Jailbreak LLMs into Generating Malicious Code
  2. 2026Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via In-Decoding Safety-Awareness Probing
  3. 2025Jailbreaking in the Haystack
  4. 2025Forewarned is Forearmed: Pre-Synthesizing Jailbreak-like Instructions to Enhance LLM Safety Guardrail to Potential Attacks
  5. 2025Logic Jailbreak: Efficiently Unlocking LLM Safety Restrictions Through Formal Logical Expression
  6. 2025Beyond Jailbreaks: Revealing Stealthier and Broader LLM Security Risks Stemming from Alignment Failures
  7. 2026Beyond the Prompt: Jailbreaking Function-Calling LLMs via Simulated Moderation Traces
  8. 2025Beyond Surface Alignment: Rebuilding LLMs Safety Mechanism via Probabilistically Ablating Refusal Direction