Hybrid Methods for Robust Tabular Data Imputation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Missing data are a fundamental challenge in statistical analysis and machine learning, as the choice of imputation method substantially impacts downstream inference. In this work, we propose two hybrid imputation methods called NuclearForest and SoftForest, which combine nuclear-norm-based low-rank initialization using Singular Value Thresholding (SVT) and SoftImpute, respectively, with a non-iterative Random Forest refinement. For the SVT-based component, we further introduce an adaptive step-size rule, prove adaptive step-size bounds, and establish convergence for the corresponding zero-initialized iteration. The low-rank initialization provides a structured warm start that captures the global covariance patterns in the data, while the subsequent Random Forest step recovers residual nonlinear signals encoding local dependencies. We conduct an extensive benchmark on diverse datasets from different application domains, comparing the proposed methods with seven established imputation methods under the Missing Completely at Random (MCAR), Missing at Random (MAR), and Missing Not at Random (MNAR) mechanisms across varying missingness rates. Our results demonstrate that NuclearForest and SoftForest match or exceed the imputation fidelity of state-of-the-art iterative methods such as MissForest, while significantly reducing computational cost. In particular, they achieve speedups of approximately 5.81 times and 9.52 times over MissForest by replacing iterative cycles with a single refinement step. Our approach effectively exploits the low-rank structure of real-world tabular data and accommodates mixed-type variables, providing an efficient and robust solution for data imputation in bioinformatics, economics, and beyond.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 24 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
7 of 24 references.
References · 7
- 2018Hyperparameters and Tuning Strategies for Random Forestcited by 83
- 2021What's a good imputation to predict with missing values?cited by 61
- 2019On the consistency of supervised learning with missing valuescited by 52
- 2017Random Forest Missing Data Algorithmscited by 23
- 2024Imputation for prediction: beware of diminishing returnscited by 11
- 2024Gradient descent with adaptive stepsize converges (nearly) linearly under fourth-order growthcited by 9
- 2017Adaptive Singular Value Thresholdingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.