Growing an Agent/Prover Interface: Evolutionary Tool Design for Cost-Efficient Theorem Proving in Rocq and Lean
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Recent achievements in AI-assisted mathematics require intensive interaction of agents with proof assistants to generate machine-checked proof certificates. Agents interact with proof assistants such as Rocq or Lean through an interface that controls what the agent receives from the prover and the cost of these interactions. Today, these interfaces are adapted from tools designed for humans and not optimized for agents. We propose an evolutionary method where a frontier model incrementally proposes new features and only keeps the ones that improve the overall performance of smaller models. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method by growing, on a curated set of mathematical problems, ROCQ-MCP-EVOLVE, a new MCP server for the Rocq prover. On the held-out test split of miniF2F-Rocq, an agent equipped with ROCQ-MCP-EVOLVE outperforms both the baseline that only exposes the Rocq compiler and an established MCP server, across four models from two families, in success rate, cost per solve, and time per solve. Although evolved for Rocq, the resulting server transfers to Lean, improving cost and time per solve on a subset of PutnamBench. We release ROCQ-MCP-EVOLVE and its port to Lean.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 31 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
19 of 31 references.
References · 19
- 2023Voyager: An Open-Ended Embodied Agent with Large Language Modelscited by 2,191
- 2024SWE-agent: Agent-Computer Interfaces Enable Automated Software Engineeringcited by 1,737
- 2021MiniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicscited by 391
- 2025Darwin Godel Machine: Open-Ended Evolution of Self-Improving Agentscited by 356
- 2026Meta-Harness: End-to-End Optimization of Model Harnessescited by 309
- 2023Large Language Models as Tool Makerscited by 303
- 2024PutnamBench: Evaluating Neural Theorem-Provers on the Putnam Mathematical Competitioncited by 165
- 2026Agentic Harness Engineering: Observability-Driven Automatic Evolution of Coding-Agent Harnessescited by 142
- 2025A Self-Improving Coding Agentcited by 79
- 2024TroVE: Inducing Verifiable and Efficient Toolboxes for Solving Programmatic Taskscited by 75
- 2026Numina-Lean-Agent: An Open and General Agentic Reasoning System for Formal Mathematicscited by 50
- 2024Pantograph: A Machine-to-Machine Interaction Interface for Advanced Theorem Proving, High Level Reasoning, and Data Extraction in Lean 4cited by 18
7 more
- 2025MiniF2F in Rocq: Automatic Translation Between Proof Assistants -- A Case Studycited by 5
- 2026AXLE: A Cloud Infrastructure for Lean 4 Theorem Proving Utilitiescited by 5
- 2026The Devil Is in the Interface: Evaluating How Tool Architecture Shapes Coding Agent Behaviorcited by 3
- 2026AI-Assisted Completion of CertiGC Proofs: An Experience Reportcited by 2
- 2026Is Bash All You Need? An Empirical Study of Tool Interfaces for Enterprise Digital Worker Agentscited by 2
- 2026RocqSmith: Can Automatic Optimization Forge Better Proof Agents?cited by 1
- 2026Self-Modifying Lean Proof Agents with Verifier-Grounded Benchmark Coevolutioncited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025RocqStar: Leveraging Similarity-driven Retrieval and Agentic Systems for Rocq generation
- 2026A Minimal Agent for Automated Theorem Proving
- 2025Prover Agent: An Agent-Based Framework for Formal Mathematical Proofs
- 2026AIProver: Agentic Auto-Formalization of Mathematical Research via Certificate-Driven Evolving Harness
- 2026Do Theorem Provers Need Theorem-Proving Agents? mini-Lean-agent: A Coding-Agent Baseline for Lean
- 2026Optimizing the Cost-Quality Tradeoff of Agentic Theorem Provers in Lean
- 2024ImProver: Agent-Based Automated Proof Optimization
- 2026Advancing Mathematics Research with AI-Driven Formal Proof Search