The Geometry of Randomized Smoothing on Feasible Sets
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Randomized smoothing certifies the probability of a fixed output event as the center of Gaussian noise moves. Feasibility or confidence filtering reports label probabilities only among retained proposals, producing a ratio. Its numerator is a fixed Gaussian event mass, while its denominator is the probability of retention and can change with the center. Substituting this ratio into the ordinary smoothing formula can therefore certify a ball that contains a decision boundary. We separate the problem into a geometric question and a certification question. Geometry determines when conditioning preserves Gaussian comparisons. Convex retained sets preserve the full comparison, while general sets require geometric control of the retained law as the center moves. Without such control, conditional probabilities imply no positive universal radius. Joint retention-and-label probabilities always yield a valid certificate for the same filtered predictor. A uniform covariance bound transfers divergence certificates to the retained law and can yield larger radii even when the Gaussian event comparison fails. Both methods admit finite-sample bounds. For a learned image classifier with a training-selected nonconvex filter, conditional R'enyi bounds certify more images than joint-mass bounds without additional model evaluations. A released confidence filter exhibits verified label changes inside radii obtained by conditional substitution. An application of adaptive Gaussian composition covers causal finite-horizon executions with history-dependent center shifts under a pathwise energy bound.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 24 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 30 Sep 2026.
Builds on
24 of 38 references.
References · 24
- 2019Do ImageNet Classifiers Generalize to ImageNet?cited by 1,515
- 2019Certified Adversarial Robustness via Randomized Smoothingcited by 1,340
- 2018Certified Robustness to Adversarial Examples with Differential Privacycited by 468
- 2018Certified Adversarial Robustness with Additive Noisecited by 180
- 2023Safety-Gymnasium: A Unified Safe Reinforcement Learning Benchmarkcited by 143
- 2022Private Convex Optimization via Exponential Mechanismcited by 49
- 2021Policy Smoothing for Provably Robust Reinforcement Learningcited by 40
- 2021Intriguing Properties of Input-dependent Randomized Smoothingcited by 24
- 2022Double Sampling Randomized Smoothingcited by 22
- 2022Individual Privacy Accounting with Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 20
- 2024Excluding the Irrelevant: Focusing Reinforcement Learning through Continuous Action Maskingcited by 19
- 2024FlowPG: Action-constrained Policy Gradient with Normalizing Flowscited by 16
12 more
- 2023Projected Randomized Smoothing for Certified Adversarial Robustnesscited by 11
- 2024Adaptive Randomized Smoothing: Certified Adversarial Robustness for Multi-Step Defencescited by 9
- 2025Efficient Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Acceptance-Rejection Method and Augmented MDPscited by 9
- 2022Fully Adaptive Composition for Gaussian Differential Privacycited by 5
- 2022Sound Randomized Smoothing in Floating-Point Arithmeticscited by 3
- 2026Improving Feasibility via Fast Autoencoder-Based Projectionscited by 3
- 2022The Bounded Gaussian Mechanism for Differential Privacycited by 2
- 2024Privacy Amplification for the Gaussian Mechanism via Bounded Supportcited by 2
- 2025AuditVotes: Elevating Provable Defense for GNNs with Efficient Augmentation and Conditional Smoothingcited by 2
- 2025Improving Stochastic Action-Constrained Reinforcement Learning via Truncated Distributionscited by 2
- 2023Truncated Laplace and Gaussian mechanisms of RDPcited by 1
- 2024Integrating uncertainty quantification into randomized smoothing based robustness guaranteescited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.