A Sharp Transition in Data Reconstruction under Differential Privacy
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Data reconstruction attacks have empirically been successful in recovering training samples from learned models, raising privacy concerns and motivating defenses with guarantees that remain valid against future threats. While differential privacy (DP) provides formal protection, choosing the privacy budget remains a challenge: small budgets severely reduce utility, but it is hard to quantify how large the budget can be without allowing accurate reconstruction. In this work, we study informed attackers who aim to reconstruct a single d-dimensional training sample from a ρ-zero-concentrated DP model, knowing all other training data. Our main contribution is to establish a sharp transition at ρ asymp d for data reconstruction: on the one hand, we derive entropy-based lower bounds for any private mechanism and any attack, characterizing a set of target priors for which reconstruction is information-theoretically impossible for ρ ll d; on the other hand, we analyze a simple attack on private linear regression with output perturbation, showing that reconstruction is practically feasible for ρ gg d. Remarkably, the transition moves to ρ asymp s for data lying in an s-dimensional subspace, demonstrating that the privacy budget guaranteeing adequate protection must be assessed in terms of the effective dimension of the data. We validate our findings via experiments on synthetic data and natural images (CIFAR-10, ImageNet).
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 41 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
41 of 53 references.
References · 41
- 2016Deep Learning with Differential Privacycited by 2,728
- 2016Membership Inference Attacks against Machine Learning Modelscited by 2,281
- 2020Extracting Training Data from Large Language Modelscited by 2,189
- 2021Membership Inference Attacks From First Principlescited by 878
- 2023Extracting Training Data from Diffusion Modelscited by 732
- 2017Renyi Differential Privacycited by 650
- 2021Large Language Models Can Be Strong Differentially Private Learnerscited by 412
- 2016Concentrated Differential Privacy: Simplifications, Extensions, and Lower Boundscited by 346
- 2019Gradient Descent Maximizes the Margin of Homogeneous Neural Networkscited by 320
- 2013The Composition Theorem for Differential Privacycited by 297
- 2022Unlocking High-Accuracy Differentially Private Image Classification through Scalecited by 224
- 2020Auditing Differentially Private Machine Learning: How Private is Private SGD?cited by 218
29 more
- 2020Directional convergence and alignment in deep learningcited by 178
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data with Informed Adversariescited by 148
- 2022Reconstructing Training Data from Trained Neural Networkscited by 133
- 2018Protection Against Reconstruction and Its Applications in Private Federated Learningcited by 130
- 2023Privacy Auditing with One (1) Training Runcited by 123
- 2021Hyperparameter Tuning with Renyi Differential Privacycited by 104
- 2022Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in Private (Deep) Learningcited by 46
- 2023Bounding Training Data Reconstruction in DP-SGDcited by 46
- 2024Evaluations of Machine Learning Privacy Defenses are Misleadingcited by 36
- 2019Exact minimax risk for linear least squares, and the lower tail of sample covariance matricescited by 34
- 2022Defending against Reconstruction Attacks with R'enyi Differential Privacycited by 32
- 2025Extracting memorized pieces of (copyrighted) books from open-weight language modelscited by 30
- 2023Deconstructing Data Reconstruction: Multiclass, Weight Decay and General Lossescited by 26
- 2025Scaling Laws for Differentially Private Language Modelscited by 22
- 2022Optimal Membership Inference Bounds for Adaptive Composition of Sampled Gaussian Mechanismscited by 19
- 2023Practical Differentially Private Hyperparameter Tuning with Subsamplingcited by 19
- 2022Analyzing Privacy Leakage in Machine Learning via Multiple Hypothesis Testing: A Lesson From Fanocited by 17
- 2023Bounding data reconstruction attacks with the hypothesis testing interpretation of differential privacycited by 15
- 2025Unifying Re-Identification, Attribute Inference, and Data Reconstruction Risks in Differential Privacycited by 15
- 2023Understanding Reconstruction Attacks with the Neural Tangent Kernel and Dataset Distillationcited by 14
- 2024Private Gradient Descent for Linear Regression: Tighter Error Bounds and Instance-Specific Uncertainty Estimationcited by 12
- 2024Reconstructing Training Data From Real World Models Trained with Transfer Learningcited by 12
- 2024Data Reconstruction Attacks and Defenses: A Systematic Evaluationcited by 6
- 2024Training Data Reconstruction: Privacy due to Uncertainty?cited by 4
- 2025High-Dimensional Private Linear Regression with Optimal Ratescited by 4
- 2025A Law of Data Reconstruction for Random Features (and Beyond)cited by 3
- 2025Setting varepsilon is not the Issue in Differential Privacycited by 3
- 2025A Unified Framework for Adversary-Aware Differential Privacy Boundscited by 2
- 2026Data Reconstruction: Identifiability and Optimization with Sample Splittingcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.