Mubric: Mutation Testing-Guided Rubric Generation for LLM Evaluation
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Rubric-based evaluation is widely used to assess LLM-based systems by decomposing response quality into task-specific scoring criteria. However, automatically generating rubrics that reliably capture task-specific quality requirements remains challenging. We introduce Mubric, a mutation testing-guided approach to rubric generation. Mutation testing, a classic software testing methodology, evaluates a test suite by injecting faults into programs and checking whether the tests detect them. We draw an analogy between test suites and rubrics: if a rubric captures an important quality requirement, introducing a corresponding defect into an otherwise high-quality response should reduce its score. Mubric first mines common defects from real pairs of preferred and dispreferred responses and abstracts these defects into reusable mutation operators, each specifying how to introduce a particular type of response defect. For a new task, it applies relevant operators to a reference response, checks whether the injected defects reduce response quality, and uses insufficiently penalized defects to refine the rubric. We evaluate Mubric on 703 tasks across four representative domains against six advanced rubric generation methods. Mubric achieves the highest overall evaluation accuracy, outperforming the strongest baseline by 7.48 percentage points.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 17 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 17 references.
References · 13
- 2023G-Eval: NLG Evaluation using GPT-4 with Better Human Alignmentcited by 2,276
- 2025HealthBench: Evaluating Large Language Models Towards Improved Human Healthcited by 429
- 2023FLASK: Fine-grained Language Model Evaluation based on Alignment Skill Setscited by 201
- 2024RM-Bench: Benchmarking Reward Models of Language Models with Subtlety and Stylecited by 176
- 2025OpenRubrics: Towards Scalable Synthetic Rubric Generation for Reward Modeling and LLM Alignmentcited by 132
- 2025Checklists Are Better Than Reward Models For Aligning Language Modelscited by 128
- 2024LLM-Rubric: A Multidimensional, Calibrated Approach to Automated Evaluation of Natural Language Textscited by 87
- 2024TICKing All the Boxes: Generated Checklists Improve LLM Evaluation and Generationcited by 68
- 2025PRBench: Large-Scale Expert Rubrics for Evaluating High-Stakes Professional Reasoningcited by 32
- 2026RubricBench: Aligning Model-Generated Rubrics with Human Standardscited by 28
- 2026Generating and Refining Dynamic Evaluation Rubrics for LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 8
- 2026AutoChecklist: Composable Pipelines for Checklist Generation and Scoring with LLM-as-a-Judgecited by 5
Built on by
Not cited yet.