mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Designing a Boundary Negotiating Artifact for Collaborative Socio-Technical Sense-Making in AI Regulatory Sandboxes

arXiv 2609.37109 ↗First posted 29 Sep 2026cs.HC cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

The rapid, unpredictable advancements in AI system capabilities has seen regulators take adaptive and experimental approaches to policymaking. Established in other domains as instruments balancing regulation with innovation, regulatory sandboxes are seen as solutions for AI regulation. However, analyses mostly focus on the legal and institutional design of AI Regulatory Sandboxes (AIRSes). With the legal framework leaving the socio-technical interpretation to stakeholders, this creates a gap on the sense-making required to fulfill the AIRS purpose. In this paper, we approach this by designing a Boundary Negotiating Artifact as a way to mediate meaning in AIRSes. Through Research-through-Design we iteratively develop a tool, providing an interface for the different stakeholders to collaborate in AI assessment. We then position it as technical backbone in established AIRS frameworks, structuring the collaborative sense-making of the involved stakeholders. We further report the insights gained from our design process leaving the qualitative evaluation for future work.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 26 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.

Builds on

4 of 26 references.

References · 4

  1. 2020Where Responsible AI meets Reality: Practitioner Perspectives on Enablers for shifting Organizational Practicescited by 39
  2. 2026Bathtubs, Boundaries, and Sandboxes: AI Regulatory Learning under Legal Uncertaintycited by 4
  3. 2019Boundary Objects and their Use in Agile Systems Engineeringcited by 3
  4. 2025Operationalising AI Regulatory Sandboxes: Activities, Requirements, and Technical Assessment under the EU AI Actcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.