Representation Dynamics Reveal Semantic Saliency and Similarity for Visual Token Pruning in MLLMs
On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency
Abstract (arXiv)
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) incur high inference latency from long visual token sequences. Existing pruning methods commonly use attention maps or output features to estimate token importance or redundancy. Several recent approaches also exploit representation changes, but when and how these changes reflect foreground saliency and semantic consistency remain insufficiently understood. We analyze visual token representation dynamics across encoder depth and uncover two findings. First, the relationship between token update magnitudes and foreground saliency is layer-dependent: large token updates concentrate on foreground regions in two depth intervals, separated by several sink-dominated layers at intermediate depths. Second, similarities between token update directions better distinguish same-class from different-class tokens than those between encoder output features. Building on these findings, we propose MSDG-Prune, a training-free method that uses update magnitudes and directions to preserve salient and diverse visual information. Specifically, we group tokens by update-direction similarity and use query-weighted saliency derived from update magnitudes across a chosen depth window for group-wise token pruning. Extensive experiments across four MLLMs demonstrate the effectiveness and generalizability of MSDG-Prune. On LLaVA-NeXT, it retains 91.9% of uncompressed performance on average with only 5.6% of visual tokens, while achieving a 7.8x prefilling speedup. Code is available at https://github.com/liweixuan-hitsz/MSDG-Prune.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 29 Sep 2026.
Builds on
0 of 0 references.
No references here yet.
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025When Token Pruning is Worse than Random: Understanding Visual Token Information in VLLMs
- 2026Capturing Token Tendencies for Training-Free Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025Don't Just Chase "Highlighted Tokens" in MLLMs: Revisiting Visual Holistic Context Retention
- 2024Beyond Text-Visual Attention: Exploiting Visual Cues for Effective Token Pruning in VLMs
- 2026Spectral Evolution-Guided Token Pruning in Multimodal Large Language Models
- 2025TrimTokenator: Towards Adaptive Visual Token Pruning for Large Multimodal Models
- 2026When Attention Collapses: Stage-Aware Visual Token Pruning from Structure to Semantics
- 2025Beyond Intermediate States: Explaining Visual Redundancy through Language