mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

HEAR: Real Voices, Real Bias: A Large-Scale Human-Recorded, Demographically Diverse Benchmark for Audio Language Models

arXiv 2609.35952 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.SD cs.AI cs.CYcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

We introduce HEAR (Human-recorded Evaluation of Audio-LLM bias by Real speakers), a large-scale, ecologically valid benchmark comprising 87k real human audio samples from 843 demographically diverse participants. HEAR enables comprehensive evaluation through Multiple Choice Question Answering (MCQA) and open-ended long-form tasks. To our knowledge, this is the first large-scale voice benchmark grounded entirely in authentic human speech. We evaluate model behavior across both real-time speech-to-speech and speech-to-text architectures. Our results reveal that voice-conditioned bias is a model-specific property. Furthermore, we demonstrate that personalization instructions consistently exacerbate demographic disparities. Our findings establish that voice bias is a controllable model characteristic, providing a foundational framework for future bias mitigation and evaluation in Audio-LLM development.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 7 of its 10 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

7 of 10 references.

References · 7

  1. 2024GPT-4o System Cardcited by 4,588
  2. 2021BBQ: A Hand-Built Bias Benchmark for Question Answeringcited by 701
  3. 2023Bias and Fairness in Large Language Models: A Surveycited by 639
  4. 2025Qwen3-Omni Technical Reportcited by 497
  5. 2025Do Bias Benchmarks Generalise? Evidence from Voice-based Evaluation of Gender Bias in SpeechLLMscited by 7
  6. 2025VoiceBBQ: Investigating Effect of Content and Acoustics in Social Bias of Spoken Language Modelcited by 6
  7. 2025Who Gets the Mic? Investigating Gender Bias in the Speaker Assignment of a Speech-LLMcited by 2

Built on by

Not cited yet.