Wasserstein Causal Forests for Distribution-Valued Outcomes
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
This paper proposes Wasserstein Causal Forests (WCF) for settings in which each unit's outcome is itself a probability distribution. This study also defines finite-grid transformed average and conditional average treatment effects, including a reference-distance contrast that asks whether treatment moves unit-level distributions toward a prespecified benchmark. Simulations cover null effects, location and shape changes, limited overlap, equal-mean but different laws, heterogeneous effects, multimodality, and structural zeros. WCF is most accurate on the conditional-law metric in most reported designs and sharply improves reference-effect estimation in the principal location-and-shape settings, but it is less accurate than the forest baselines for multimodal settings. WCF is applied to the famous Project STAR citepword1990state, revealing that small classes alter more than the mean: they raise within-grade mathematics achievement by 0.161 standard deviations on average (SE 0.028); but the gain is not a uniform location shift, it is larger in the upper part of the classroom score distribution (+0.179 at the ninetieth percentile versus +0.091 at the tenth) and, in descriptive stratum estimates, largest in the schools serving the most economically disadvantaged students (highest free-lunch quartile, +0.262, versus +0.092 to +0.164 elsewhere), while overall dispersion is essentially unchanged.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 37 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 37 references.
References · 13
- 2018Computational Optimal Transportcited by 765
- 2015Estimation and Inference of Heterogeneous Treatment Effects using Random Forestscited by 597
- 2016Generalized Random Forestscited by 309
- 2017Bayesian regression tree models for causal inference: regularization, confounding, and heterogeneous effectscited by 41
- 2021Conditional Distributional Treatment Effect with Kernel Conditional Mean Embeddings and U-Statistic Regressioncited by 40
- 2020Distributional Random Forests: Heterogeneity Adjustment and Multivariate Distributional Regressioncited by 36
- 2018Counterfactual Mean Embeddingscited by 32
- 2022Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effectscited by 18
- 2023An Efficient Doubly-Robust Test for the Kernel Treatment Effectcited by 10
- 2023Confidence and Uncertainty Assessment for Distributional Random Forestscited by 5
- 2024Causal-DRF: Conditional Kernel Treatment Effect Estimation using Distributional Random Forestcited by 5
- 2026Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects: Doubly Robust Estimation and Testingcited by 1
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.