mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Beyond the Context Window: An Adaptive Entropy-Based Routing Framework for Hybrid Retrieval and Long-Context Language Models

arXiv 2609.35831 ↗First posted 23 Sep 2026cs.CLcited by 0

On the map: Retrieval-augmented generation → Generation and context integration also fits: RAG robustness and adaptive retrieval

Abstract (arXiv)

Modern large language models now support context windows of more than one million tokens, which has raised the question of whether retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is still necessary. Pure long-context (LC) processing is expensive and is known to under-attend to information placed in the middle of long inputs, while pure RAG is fast but bounded by retrieval quality and prone to errors when retrieved chunks are partially relevant or contradictory. We propose the Entropy-Driven Adaptive Router (EDAR), a framework that decides at inference time whether to answer a query from retrieved chunks or to escalate it to full long-context processing. The decision uses the predictive entropy of the token-level probability distribution computed over the first few generated tokens of the RAG response. The entropy threshold is selected on a held-out validation set by sweeping cost against accuracy. Experiments compare EDAR against pure-RAG and pure-LC baselines on LongBench v2 and Infinity-Bench. Predictive entropy correlates strongly with hallucination rate on a held-out set of 2,000 generations (Pearson r = 0.85, 95% CI [0.83, 0.87]). On the long-context benchmarks, EDAR retains 97.4% of the accuracy of the pure long-context baseline while reducing total token expenditure by 70.7%, escalating only 18.2% of incoming queries. The accuracy gap between EDAR and the pure long-context system is not statistically distinguishable from zero at standard sample sizes. Predictive entropy is a useful model-internal signal for routing between RAG and long-context inference, and a threshold-based hybrid system can recover most of the accuracy of long-context models at a small fraction of the cost. The framework does not depend on a specific retriever or LC backbone, and it does not require additional supervision beyond what is normally produced during decoding.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Generation and context integration, one of 15 directions in Retrieval-augmented generation. Builds on 5 of its 5 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 23 Sep 2026.

Builds on

5 of 5 references.

References · 5

  1. 2023Semantic Uncertainty: Linguistic Invariances for Uncertainty Estimation in Natural Language Generationcited by 819
  2. 2024RouteLLM: Learning to Route LLMs with Preference Datacited by 682
  3. 2023Ragas: Automated Evaluation of Retrieval Augmented Generationcited by 418
  4. 2024RouterBench: A Benchmark for Multi-LLM Routing Systemcited by 238
  5. 2024Retrieval Augmented Generation or Long-Context LLMs? A Comprehensive Study and Hybrid Approachcited by 119

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026L-RAG: Balancing Context and Retrieval with Entropy-Based Lazy Loading
  2. 2025BEE-RAG: Balanced Entropy Engineering for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  3. 2026Latent Abstraction for Retrieval-Augmented Generation
  4. 2025SUGAR: Leveraging Contextual Confidence for Smarter Retrieval
  5. 2024Contextual Compression in Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Large Language Models: A Survey
  6. 2024Inference Scaling for Long-Context Retrieval Augmented Generation
  7. 2026Mapping the RAG Landscape: A Four Axis Taxonomy of Efficiency, Defense, Interactivity, and Reasoning
  8. 2025Optimizing Retrieval-Augmented Generation: Analysis of Hyperparameter Impact on Performance and Efficiency