Reinforcing Agentic Creativity in Scientific Ideation with Night Science
On the map: LLM agents and tool use → General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks also fits: Educational agents and math problem solving
Abstract (arXiv)
Large language models (LLMs) excel at structured, verifiable tasks, but their low-entropy bias can produce homogeneous and predictable outputs, limiting their utility for open-ended scientific ideation. Effective discovery, however, spans a broader creative spectrum: from structured day science to loosely structured, serendipitous night science that reaches ideas beyond those typically considered. We introduce AI Night-Scientist, an agentic framework that uses reinforcement learning to teach models when and how to depart from predictable reasoning. Grounded in cognitive science, we model creativity along three axes: action (what to do and how creatively), process (when to explore versus exploit), and outcome (the novelty and usefulness of the resulting idea). We use these axes to train models with GRPO, exposing them to varying degrees and forms of creativity throughout training. This produces substantially more diverse scientific proposals, expanding the range of research directions by 27.8% and contribution types by 14.9% over the base model. It also improves predicted citation impact by up to 32.0 percentage points and originality by 66.2 points. These gains cannot be reproduced by simply increasing decoding temperature; instead, we find that semantic guidance specifying what kind of creativity to pursue is critical. Overall, our results suggest that creativity is a learnable, multi-level ability that can be shaped to help researchers reach ideas beyond those typically explored by LLMs.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in General LLM agent frameworks and benchmarks, one of 16 directions in LLM agents and tool use. Builds on 25 of its 53 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 53 references.
References · 25
- 2024DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits of Mathematical Reasoning in Open Language Modelscited by 9,379
- 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,695
- 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
- 2024HybridFlow: A Flexible and Efficient RLHF Frameworkcited by 2,057
- 2024Can LLMs Generate Novel Research Ideas? A Large-Scale Human Study with 100+ NLP Researcherscited by 363
- 2025Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Examplecited by 295
- 2023SciMON: Scientific Inspiration Machines Optimized for Noveltycited by 179
- 2025The Unreasonable Effectiveness of Entropy Minimization in LLM Reasoningcited by 166
- 2023Can ChatGPT replace StackOverflow? A Study on Robustness and Reliability of Large Language Model Code Generationcited by 73
- 2024LLM Discussion: Enhancing the Creativity of Large Language Models via Discussion Framework and Role-Playcited by 66
- 2025We're Different, We're the Same: Creative Homogeneity Across LLMscited by 42
- 2024Assessing and Understanding Creativity in Large Language Modelscited by 35
13 more
- 2025AutoDiscovery: Open-ended Scientific Discovery via Bayesian Surprisecited by 33
- 2025Cognitive Foundations for Reasoning and Their Manifestation in LLMscited by 26
- 2025Sparks of Science: Hypothesis Generation Using Structured Paper Datacited by 25
- 2025All That Glitters is Not Novel: Plagiarism in AI Generated Researchcited by 18
- 2024LLMs can Realize Combinatorial Creativity: Generating Creative Ideas via LLMs for Scientific Researchcited by 17
- 2025Beyond "Not Novel Enough": Enriching Scholarly Critique with LLM-Assisted Feedbackcited by 12
- 2026AI Can Learn Scientific Tastecited by 11
- 2026Measuring the Gap Between Human and LLM Research Ideascited by 10
- 2026GIANTS: Generative Insight Anticipation from Scientific Literaturecited by 8
- 2025Tree-of-Debate: Multi-Persona Debate Trees Elicit Critical Thinking for Scientific Comparative Analysiscited by 6
- 2026Sparking Scientific Creativity via LLM-Driven Interdisciplinary Inspirationcited by 4
- 2025Beyond True or False: Retrieval-Augmented Hierarchical Analysis of Nuanced Claimscited by 3
- 2026Are LLMs becoming similarly creative? Evidence from three years of modelscited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Large Language Models for Scientific Idea Generation: A Creativity-Centered Survey
- 2026AgentIdeaBench: Benchmarking Scientific Ideation in the Agent Era
- 2026Debate as Reward: A Multi-Agent Reward System for Scientific Ideation via RL Post-Training
- 2026Can LLM Agents Discover? Evaluating Creativity on ML Engineering Tasks
- 2026Contemporary AI lacks the imagination to diverge or negate in science
- 2024AI Knowledge and Reasoning: Emulating Expert Creativity in Scientific Research
- 2026On the Creativity of AI Agents
- 2026Beyond One Path: Evaluating and Enhancing Divergent Thinking in Interactive LLM Agents