MS-GLA: Multi-Scale Gated Linear Attention for Addressing Representational Bottlenecks via Multi-Temporal Resolution
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Gated Linear Attention (GLA) Transformers advance linear recurrent models through data-dependent gating, but face a core limitation: the fixed-capacity memory matrices across all heads operate at a single temporal resolution, where each token is processed individually, forcing them to simultaneously encode local syntactic patterns and long-range semantic structure, creating a representational bottleneck that gating alone is insufficient to resolve. We introduce Multi-Scale Gated Linear Attention (MS-GLA), which addresses this by distributing attention heads across multiple temporal resolutions. Coarser resolutions pool longer token spans naturally specializing toward long-range dependencies, while finer head groups retain sensitivity to local syntactic structure. A learnable, input-dependent fusion layer dynamically recombines head group outputs at each timestep, expanding effective memory capacity without increasing per-head state size. This multi-resolution decomposition draws on principles from Multi-Scale State-Space Models (MS-SSM), adapting them to the gated linear attention setting. We evaluate MS-GLA on language modeling, recall-intensive tasks, and long-context generalization. Across all settings, MS-GLA consistently achieves higher accuracy and lower perplexity than GLA at matched parameter counts, with up to 18.9% improvement on recall-intensive tasks and 9.5% lower average perplexity on language modeling benchmarks, validating multi-temporal resolution decomposition as a principled and effective extension of Gated Linear Attention.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 29 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 29 references.
References · 20
- 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
- 2019HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?cited by 4,100
- 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
- 2019PIQA: Reasoning about Physical Commonsense in Natural Languagecited by 2,883
- 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
- 2017Decoupled Weight Decay Regularizationcited by 1,831
- 2018Know What You Don't Know: Unanswerable Questions for SQuADcited by 1,554
- 2016The LAMBADA dataset: Word prediction requiring a broad discourse contextcited by 992
- 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 726
- 2023Retentive Network: A Successor to Transformer for Large Language Modelscited by 613
- 2023Gated Linear Attention Transformers with Hardware-Efficient Trainingcited by 514
- 2024Simple linear attention language models balance the recall-throughput tradeoffcited by 208
8 more
- 2022Transformer Quality in Linear Timecited by 191
- 2023Language Models Enable Simple Systems for Generating Structured Views of Heterogeneous Data Lakescited by 111
- 2021Hierarchical Transformers Are More Efficient Language Modelscited by 102
- 2025MoM: Linear Sequence Modeling with Mixture-of-Memoriescited by 47
- 2020Language Through a Prism: A Spectral Approach for Multiscale Language Representationscited by 39
- 2023Spectral State Space Modelscited by 21
- 2023Sequence Modeling with Multiresolution Convolutional Memorycited by 19
- 2025MS-SSM: A Multi-Scale State Space Model for Efficient Sequence Modelingcited by 2
Built on by
Not cited yet.
Similar, not cited
Close in wording, no citation either way
- 2025Gating is Weighting: Understanding Gated Linear Attention through In-context Learning
- 2025GTA: Grouped-head latenT Attention
- 2026Sliding-window beats linear attention
- 2026Blurry Window Attention
- 2025Native Sparse Attention: Hardware-Aligned and Natively Trainable Sparse Attention
- 2026State Rank Dynamics in Linear Attention LLMs
- 2026Linear Predictability of Attention Heads in Large Language Models
- 2026SPLA: Block Sparse Plus Linear Attention for Long Context Modeling