Which the Eye Fears: Writing with Read-Blindness Explains Massive Activations in Transformers
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Massive activation features (MAs) in Transformers are extreme-value residual-stream features that persist across layers despite the model's ability to suppress them. Why do they survive? Our investigation using an operator-level mechanistic analysis of attention and feed-forward (FFN) blocks reveals that these blocks systematically ignore MA coordinates while reading, but not while writing; creating a read-write asymmetry that blocks corrective feedback while allowing continued accumulation. We find that both attention and feed-forward layers have this read-blindness, and contribute to the emergence and persistence of MAs. To validate prior work that hypothesized that FFN's amplification abilities is the primary reason for MAs (Sun et al., 2026), we analyze the model checkpoints during learning. Contrary to our expectation, read-blindness emerges before FFN amplification, suggesting that it acts upstream in the MA mechanism. We further contribute gradient analysis to link this behavior to surprising asymmetries in the loss landscape, concluding that the model actively maintains this read-blindness. Finally, we find that removing read-blocking at different locations induces compensatory shifts elsewhere, but MAs still persist.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 13 of its 16 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
13 of 16 references.
References · 13
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Efficient Streaming Language Models with Attention Sinkscited by 2,186
- 2023Model Tells You What to Discard: Adaptive KV Cache Compression for LLMscited by 474
- 2024Massive Activations in Large Language Modelscited by 294
- 2024When Attention Sink Emerges in Language Models: An Empirical Viewcited by 208
- 2023Quantizable Transformers: Removing Outliers by Helping Attention Heads Do Nothingcited by 151
- 2024Spectral Filters, Dark Signals, and Attention Sinkscited by 56
- 2024The Super Weight in Large Language Modelscited by 52
- 2025Attention Sinks and Compression Valleys in LLMs are Two Sides of the Same Coincited by 52
- 2025Systematic Outliers in Large Language Modelscited by 33
- 2026The Spike, the Sparse and the Sink: Anatomy of Massive Activations and Attention Sinkscited by 27
- 2025A Refined Analysis of Massive Activations in LLMscited by 12
1 more
Built on by
Not cited yet.