mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

Multi-Attractor GNNs: Set-Valued Expressivity Beyond Unique Equilibria

arXiv 2609.35274 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Recurrent and equilibrium graph neural networks (GNNs) often enforce a unique fixed point or use one training target per graph. Yet many combinatorial and scientific problems admit multiple valid solutions, with no preferred one. A designated target can then impose an arbitrary selection rule. For tasks invariant to node relabeling, a symmetric graph may have a symmetric solution set but no symmetric solution. We show that multiple equilibria enable one weight-tied message-passing GNN to represent set-valued equivariant maps: different initializations approach different valid solutions. Under stated regularity assumptions, we first construct globally Lipschitz, permutation-equivariant dynamics that converge almost surely to valid solutions and reach every solution branch with positive probability. We then establish approximate realization by recurrent message passing with continuous component maps, with arbitrarily small update and limiting errors and arbitrarily high probability. This goes beyond standard universality arguments: although message passing alone cannot distinguish symmetric nodes, the evolving state keeps nodes distinguishable at every finite step without auxiliary node identifiers. Such dynamics can be learned without solution labels using problem-specific energies. On Ising ground states, structural module detection in protein graphs, and chemical reaction steady states, the learned updates produce multiple high-quality predictions with high numerical convergence rates. They achieve better average solution quality than the tested unique-equilibrium, single-target, and feedforward baselines, while remaining competitive with much larger diffusion-based solvers.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 18 of its 70 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

18 of 70 references.

References · 18

  1. 2018How Powerful are Graph Neural Networks?cited by 4,393
  2. 2015Gated Graph Sequence Neural Networkscited by 796
  3. 2020TUDataset: A collection of benchmark datasets for learning with graphscited by 728
  4. 2020Hopfield Networks is All You Needcited by 475
  5. 2019What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthcited by 201
  6. 2018Learning a SAT Solver from Single-Bit Supervisioncited by 200
  7. 2020The Surprising Power of Graph Neural Networks with Random Node Initializationcited by 198
  8. 2019Neural Execution of Graph Algorithmscited by 121
  9. 2022Expressiveness and Approximation Properties of Graph Neural Networkscited by 64
  10. 2023Symmetry Breaking and Equivariant Neural Networkscited by 25
  11. 2022Annealed Training for Combinatorial Optimization on Graphscited by 18
  12. 2018A simple yet effective baseline for non-attributed graph classificationcited by 17
6 more
  1. 2020Neural Learning of One-of-Many Solutions for Combinatorial Problems in Structured Output Spacescited by 14
  2. 2021Convergent Graph Solverscited by 12
  3. 2025Equivariant Flow Matching for Symmetry-Breaking Bifurcation Problemscited by 4
  4. 2026Universality and Approximation Rates of Graph Neural Networks with Random Featurescited by 3
  5. 2026Any-Subgroup Equivariant Networks via Symmetry Breakingcited by 2
  6. 2026Bifurcation Models: Learning Set-Valued Solution Maps with Weight-Tied Dynamicscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.