mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

SubRot: Signed Gradient Subspace Calibration for VLM Rotation Quantization

arXiv 2609.34884 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.CVcited by 0

On the map: Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models → Visual token pruning and efficiency also fits: Prompt learning and adaptation of CLIP

Abstract (arXiv)

Post-training quantization reduces the deployment cost of vision-language models (VLMs), but preserving multimodal capabilities at low bit widths remains challenging. Existing methods rely on modality- or token-level gradient statistics, which are susceptible to cross-sample variations in visual-to-textual token ratios and the positions of visual information, limiting statistical stability. Moreover, overly coarse aggregation through absolute values and averaging discards gradient signs and channel-wise differences, limiting the separation of modality-specific sensitivities. In contrast, the channel space provides a shared coordinate system across samples, making it a more natural basis for capturing stable task-sensitive structures. We therefore propose SubRot, a signed gradient subspace calibration method for VLM rotation quantization. Through eigendecomposition of the empirical Fisher matrix of activation gradients, SubRot identifies a sensitive channel subspace with three properties: cross-sample stability, clear sensitivity separation, and consistent signed effects on the autoregressive loss along certain directions. Guided by a local Taylor expansion, SubRot combines signed first-order guidance along sign-stable directions with second-order constraints along the remaining sensitive directions, while retaining MSE for overall reconstruction quality. This objective steers quantization errors toward loss-decreasing directions while controlling their magnitude. Experiments on five VLMs across five benchmarks show consistent average-score improvements over FlatQuant under W4A6 and W4A4, reaching 1.4 percentage points on LLaVA-NeXT-7B. Under W4A4, average accuracy degradation from FP16 remains within 1.4 percentage points across all evaluated models, while LLaVA-v1.5-13B exceeds its FP16 average score by 0.4 percentage points.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Placed in Visual token pruning and efficiency, one of 16 directions in Multimodal LLMs / vision-language models. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

0 of 0 references.

No references here yet.

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026Rethinking Practical and Efficient Quantization Calibration for Vision-Language Models
  2. 2026Calibrate Before Reason: Robust Visual Token Reduction against Semantic Drift in VLMs
  3. 2026VLAQuantBench: Closed-Loop Evaluation of Post-Training Quantization for Vision-Language-Action Models
  4. 2025Less Precise Can Be More Reliable: A Systematic Evaluation of Quantization's Impact on VLMs Beyond Accuracy
  5. 2026SPHQuant: Efficient extreme low bit weight quantization for Vision-Language Models
  6. 2026RGSQ: Riemannian Geometry-Sensitive Quantization for Large Vision-Language Models
  7. 2026QuantVLA: Scale-Calibrated Post-Training Quantization for Vision-Language-Action Models
  8. 2026MGVQ: Synergizing Multi-dimensional Sensitivity-Aware and Gradient-Hessian Fusion for Vector Quantization