mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

PDE-JEPA: Predictive Representation Learning of Latent Dynamics Modeling for Parametric PDEs

arXiv 2609.34715 ↗First posted 28 Sep 2026cs.AIcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Physical trajectories contain more than snapshots of a system: they also reveal how its states evolve under governing conditions. However, representation learning for parametric partial differential equations (PDEs) has largely relied on reconstruction-based objectives that emphasize recovering observed physical fields. In this paper, we investigate predictive representation pretraining as an alternative to reconstruction-based learning. We find that predictive representations preserve rich physical information, yet this advantage alone does not ensure accurate field evolution. Based on these observations, we introduce PDE-JEPA for parametric PDE dynamics. Specifically, we first train an encoder using a masked-latent prediction to capture the underlying regularities of PDE dynamics. To explicitly adapt the pretrained representation toward a more dynamics-aligned state space, we then introduce a geometry projector that aligns latent trajectory geometry with the evolution geometry of physical fields. Finally, building on this geometry-aligned latent space, we further develop a physics-structured latent predictor that decomposes the dynamics into parameter-independent evolution and parameter-dependent response components. Extensive experiments on nine widely used PDE benchmarks demonstrate that our framework outperforms existing state-of-the-art methods by an average of 33.4% in-distribution, while achieving an average improvement of 51.4% when extrapolating to unseen governing parameters. The project page is available hrefhttps://tanpig-x.github.io/PDE-JEPA/here.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 28 of its 71 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.

Builds on

28 of 71 references.

References · 28

  1. 2020Fourier Neural Operator for Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 2,908
  2. 2024Revisiting Feature Prediction for Learning Visual Representations from Videocited by 531
  3. 2022Message Passing Neural PDE Solverscited by 386
  4. 2024Transolver: A Fast Transformer Solver for PDEs on General Geometriescited by 326
  5. 2026LeWorldModel: Stable End-to-End Joint-Embedding Predictive Architecture from Pixelscited by 273
  6. 2024DPOT: Auto-Regressive Denoising Operator Transformer for Large-Scale PDE Pre-Trainingcited by 151
  7. 2026V-JEPA 2.1: Unlocking Dense Features in Video Self-Supervised Learningcited by 117
  8. 2022Predicting Physics in Mesh-reduced Space with Temporal Attentioncited by 84
  9. 2022CROM: Continuous Reduced-Order Modeling of PDEs Using Implicit Neural Representationscited by 58
  10. 2025What Drives Success in Physical Planning with Joint-Embedding Predictive World Models?cited by 43
  11. 2024Parameterized Physics-informed Neural Networks for Parameterized PDEscited by 38
  12. 2026Temporal Straightening for Latent Planningcited by 38
16 more
  1. 2025Walrus: A Cross-Domain Foundation Model for Continuum Dynamicscited by 36
  2. 2024Unisolver: PDE-Conditional Transformers Towards Universal Neural PDE Solverscited by 35
  3. 2026When Does LeJEPA Learn a World Model?cited by 30
  4. 2024Recent Advances on Machine Learning for Computational Fluid Dynamics: A Surveycited by 28
  5. 2024Zebra: In-Context Generative Pretraining for Solving Parametric PDEscited by 16
  6. 2024CoLoRA: Continuous low-rank adaptation for reduced implicit neural modeling of parameterized partial differential equationscited by 14
  7. 2024Masked Autoencoders are PDE Learnerscited by 14
  8. 2024Vectorized Conditional Neural Fields: A Framework for Solving Time-dependent Parametric Partial Differential Equationscited by 12
  9. 2026Representation Learning for Spatiotemporal Physical Systemscited by 11
  10. 2026GeoPT: Scaling Physics Simulation via Lifted Geometric Pre-Trainingcited by 10
  11. 2026Is Forward Prediction Enough? Physical State Grounding for JEPA World Modelscited by 8
  12. 2026AeroJEPA: Learning Semantic Latent Representations for Scalable 3D Aerodynamic Field Modelingcited by 4
  13. 2026Learning Physical Operators using Neural Operatorscited by 2
  14. 2026Harnessing AI for Inverse Partial Differential Equation Problems: Past, Present, and Prospectscited by 1
  15. 2026Generalized Neural Operator for Parametric and Boundary-Value Problemscited by 1
  16. 2026From Points to Edges: Edge-Conditioned Spectral Operators for Physics-Sensitive PDE Learningcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.