ResonAct: Streaming Metrics for Runtime Diagnosis and Self-Healing in Multi-Agent Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Multi-agent systems (MAS) are increasingly used to automate enterprise workflows involving multiple specialized agents, external tools, and long-running task execution. Failures may arise from tool degradation, context propagation errors, coordination breakdowns, or repeated agent interactions that prevent task completion. While existing observability frameworks provide traces and logs, diagnosis and remediation are largely performed after execution completes, limiting opportunities for recovery during runtime. We present ResonAct, a runtime self-healing framework that enables continuous monitoring, diagnosis, and remediation of multi-agent systems through streaming operational metrics. ResonAct ingests execution traces, agent interactions, and tool invocations into a streaming analytics layer that continuously derives task progress, context health, and tool reliability metrics. These metrics serve as runtime control signals for detecting anomalous execution patterns and localizing root causes using a structured failure model. Based on the diagnosed failure, ResonAct dynamically selects remediation policies and performs actions. The framework operates as an external control plane, enabling intervention without modifying application agents or orchestration logic. We evaluate ResonAct across enterprise workflow scenarios and AppWorld benchmarks. The results show that the streaming metric-based analysis identifies execution degradations and localizes faults. Furthermore, policy-driven remediation improves task completion rates by up to 10.00 percentage points, with detection precision ranging from 70.59% to 82.91%, recall from 63.09% to 100%, recovery rates from 10.48% to 46.67%, and runtime overhead ranging from -0.25% to 14.12% across the evaluated configurations.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 4 of its 15 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 28 Sep 2026.
Builds on
4 of 15 references.
References · 4
- 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
- 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
- 2024On the Resilience of LLM-Based Multi-Agent Collaboration with Faulty Agentscited by 92
- 2026How Do AI Agents Spend Your Money? Analyzing and Predicting Token Consumption in Agentic Coding Taskscited by 28
Built on by
Not cited yet.