mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

SchemaMem: Schema-Indexed Recurrent Memory for Delayed State Retrieval

arXiv 2609.33436 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Attention provides direct access to past representations, but retaining an ever-growing history is costly. Recurrent models bound persistent state, yet must preserve selected information while processing subsequent inputs. We introduce SchemaMem, an attention-based recurrent memory architecture combining chunk-local attention with a persistent, schema-indexed phase state. Learned schema embeddings provide a shared representational reference for reading and writing. Reads use the current state, whereas writes use the layer input and static schema embeddings, excluding direct feedback from that layer's own state. Chunk-boundary commits aggregate bounded phase increments through forward computation. The same parameters also support full-history attention training before and during recurrent training. We studied selective updates, preservation, and delayed retrieval in a controlled address--value task, comparing three-layer models with approximately matched parameter counts and persistent-state dimensions. Across nine address/value settings and three training seeds, SchemaMem has higher mean written-value retention at four times the maximum training delay than both baselines, which are trained toward a higher in-range accuracy target. Updated-value recovery favors SchemaMem in all nine settings against Mamba-3 and seven against Gated DeltaNet. Defaults consistently favor Gated DeltaNet over SchemaMem at that delay, and SchemaMem requires substantially more optimization steps. These results identify a promising retention--optimization trade-off in schema-indexed recurrence.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 14 of its 14 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

14 of 14 references.

References · 14

  1. 2017Attention Is All You Needcited by 60,361
  2. 2023Mamba: Linear-Time Sequence Modeling with Selective State Spacescited by 4,718
  3. 2020Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear Attentioncited by 2,022
  4. 2019Transformer-XL: Attentive Language Models Beyond a Fixed-Length Contextcited by 1,850
  5. 2024Transformers are SSMs: Generalized Models and Efficient Algorithms Through Structured State Space Dualitycited by 1,336
  6. 2019Compressive Transformers for Long-Range Sequence Modellingcited by 726
  7. 2014Neural Turing Machinescited by 644
  8. 2024Gated Delta Networks: Improving Mamba2 with Delta Rulecited by 532
  9. 2024Parallelizing Linear Transformers with the Delta Rule over Sequence Lengthcited by 396
  10. 2022Recurrent Memory Transformercited by 203
  11. 2022Block-Recurrent Transformerscited by 110
  12. 2019Augmenting Self-attention with Persistent Memorycited by 93
2 more
  1. 2026Mamba-3: Improved Sequence Modeling using State Space Principlescited by 89
  2. 2025MemMamba: Rethinking Memory Patterns in State Space Modelcited by 3

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2026MARCH: Scaling Recurrent Memory with Content-Routed State Anchors
  2. 2026History Replays Itself: Unleashing Long-Context Capability in Linear Attention
  3. 2026RunningTensor: Generalizing Linear Attention to Higher-Order Recurrent States
  4. 2026Balancing Memory Pathways: Analyzing and Improving Memory Utilization in Hybrid LMs
  5. 2026Raven: High-Recall Sequence Modeling with Sparse Memory Routing
  6. 2026Remembering Distinct Items, Not Tokens: A Learnable Dirichlet-Process Cache Between State-Space Models and Attention
  7. 2026Memory by Design: Bayesian Layers for Sequence Modeling
  8. 2026Sessa: Selective State Space Attention