mlsanityData to 7 Oct 2026

CORTEX: A Verified Experience Layer for Generalist Agents

arXiv 2609.33260 ↗First posted 27 Sep 2026cs.AI cs.LG cs.MAcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

An agent can solve a task today and face the same task under new facts, tools, or governing knowledge tomorrow. Most agent systems can retrieve relevant text or recall prior conversations, but they lack a principled way to decide when a previous solution is still valid, when it must be adapted, and when it should be discarded. We introduce CORTEX (Contextual Orchestration and Reuse of Task EXperience), a general AI systems framework that connects specialized agents through an external layer of verified experience. Each episode records its task conditions, source and tool state, decisive predicates, proof trace, verifier, and outcome. A meta-controller chooses exact replay, checked adaptation, fresh synthesis, or escalation. Accepted episodes can become task patterns and procedural strategies through a challenge-driven development loop. This gives the system an implicit competence layer that can grow without changing model weights. We formalize system contracts for exact replay and source-version separation, and derive when reuse saves computation. A controlled two-domain implementation tests the exact-replay core on 1,000 synthetic cases. Complete-family holdouts test procedural transfer on 1,000 new-family cases across eight clinical and policy splits, with complete fresh-evidence grounding and perfect invariance to irrelevant-field and insertion-order perturbations. The transfer trace exposes the work required for verified strategy execution. These results establish an initial path toward general intelligence through reusable procedures, typed experience, and developmental transfer.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 7 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 59 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.

Builds on

20 of 59 references.

References · 20

  1. 2020Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP Taskscited by 9,160
  2. 2022ReAct: Synergizing Reasoning and Acting in Language Modelscited by 8,355
  3. 2017On Calibration of Modern Neural Networkscited by 4,860
  4. 2023Reflexion: Language Agents with Verbal Reinforcement Learningcited by 4,064
  5. 2023Generative Agents: Interactive Simulacra of Human Behaviorcited by 3,500
  6. 2023AutoGen: Enabling Next-Gen LLM Applications via Multi-Agent Conversationcited by 1,906
  7. 2018Datasheets for Datasetscited by 1,371
  8. 2023CAMEL: Communicative Agents for "Mind" Exploration of Large Language Model Societycited by 1,348
  9. 2023Not what you've signed up for: Compromising Real-World LLM-Integrated Applications with Indirect Prompt Injectioncited by 1,339
  10. 2023MemGPT: Towards LLMs as Operating Systemscited by 1,295
  11. 2024τ-bench: A Benchmark for Tool-Agent-User Interaction in Real-World Domainscited by 1,280
  12. 2018Model Cards for Model Reportingcited by 1,068
8 more
  1. 2017Selective Classification for Deep Neural Networkscited by 799
  2. 2022Ignore Previous Prompt: Attack Techniques For Language Modelscited by 760
  3. 2023Enabling Large Language Models to Generate Text with Citationscited by 584
  4. 2025Why Do Multi-Agent LLM Systems Fail?cited by 559
  5. 2020Does the Whole Exceed its Parts? The Effect of AI Explanations on Complementary Team Performancecited by 396
  6. 2023Evaluating Verifiability in Generative Search Enginescited by 297
  7. 2020Consistent Estimators for Learning to Defer to an Expertcited by 262
  8. 2024LLMs Can't Plan, But Can Help Planning in LLM-Modulo Frameworkscited by 178

Built on by

Not cited yet.