Algorithmic Harms Associated with Generative Model-Augmented Recommendation Systems
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
In this work, we consider algorithmic harms that may arise as generative models are incorporated into machine learning platforms. We argue that existing harm taxonomies and threat models require extension to (1) address novel causal drivers of well-studied representational and quality-of-service harms; and (2) anticipate and mitigate endogenous harms, such as sanitization, which may arise when system inputs are misaligned with the system designer's objectives, or the generative model's inductive priors. To this end, we introduce an expanded taxonomy of algorithmic harms associated with the use of generative models in non-conversational recommendation systems. In addition, we offer a causal analysis of how problematic subsets of the (input, output) joint distribution can arise, in an effort to inform harms detection and mitigation efforts.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 20 of its 38 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 27 Sep 2026.
Builds on
20 of 38 references.
References · 20
- 2018BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understandingcited by 40,399
- 2023Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Modelscited by 13,028
- 2023Lost in the Middle: How Language Models Use Long Contextscited by 3,455
- 2020Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPcited by 956
- 2018Gender Bias in Coreference Resolution: Evaluation and Debiasing Methodscited by 659
- 2023A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendationcited by 379
- 2023LooGLE: Can Long-Context Language Models Understand Long Contexts?cited by 202
- 2023Do-Not-Answer: A Dataset for Evaluating Safeguards in LLMscited by 184
- 2018The Frontiers of Fairness in Machine Learningcited by 141
- 2022Sociotechnical Harms of Algorithmic Systems: Scoping a Taxonomy for Harm Reductioncited by 138
- 2023Increasing Diversity While Maintaining Accuracy: Text Data Generation with Large Language Models and Human Interventionscited by 125
- 2017FA*IR: A Fair Top-k Ranking Algorithmcited by 113
8 more
- 2021Understanding and Evaluating Racial Biases in Image Captioningcited by 108
- 2024Bias and Unfairness in Information Retrieval Systems: New Challenges in the LLM Eracited by 98
- 2014Automated Experiments on Ad Privacy Settings: A Tale of Opacity, Choice, and Discriminationcited by 83
- 2021On Measures of Biases and Harms in NLPcited by 81
- 2024Against The Achilles' Heel: A Survey on Red Teaming for Generative Modelscited by 59
- 2023TIBET: Identifying and Evaluating Biases in Text-to-Image Generative Modelscited by 52
- 2022Measuring Representational Harms in Image Captioningcited by 36
- 2023Confronting LLMs with Traditional ML: Rethinking the Fairness of Large Language Models in Tabular Classificationscited by 15
Built on by
Not cited yet.