Latent Space Is Not Flat: Rethinking Latent Structure for 3D Medical Image Synthesis
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Latent generative models make 3D medical image synthesis computationally practical by generating in a compressed space. However, we show that the common flat Euclidean assumption induced by ℓ2 objectives is imprecise: latent-space geometry is so strongly anisotropic that equal-magnitude errors can produce drastically different decoded distortions. We further find that this anisotropy has a clear feature: sensitive variation concentrates in a low-rank subspace. The dominant low-rank components capture the overall structure, encoding long-range, spatially coordinated variation while remaining resistant to local noise. Its orthogonal residual, in contrast, mainly captures local and image-specific variation. Motivated by this asymmetry, we introduce Latent Structure Flow (LSF). At each block, LSF decomposes the latent state into structure and residual, models structural changes with global context, and predicts residual variation locally while preserving a direct path for the input structure. LSF changes only the generator, leaving the frozen codec and pointwise training objective unchanged. Across cross-modality synthesis and tumor inpainting tasks, LSF outperforms all compared baselines on both global and tumor-specific metrics, demonstrating the benefit of explicitly modeling latent-space structure for 3D medical image synthesis.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 25 of its 27 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
25 of 27 references.
References · 25
- 2021High-Resolution Image Synthesis with Latent Diffusion Modelscited by 18,863
- 2022Scalable Diffusion Models with Transformerscited by 6,054
- 2022Flow Matching for Generative Modelingcited by 5,702
- 2021The RSNA-ASNR-MICCAI BraTS 2021 Benchmark on Brain Tumor Segmentation and Radiogenomic Classificationcited by 518
- 2024Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden Statescited by 355
- 2019Med3D: Transfer Learning for 3D Medical Image Analysiscited by 288
- 2024MAISI: Medical AI for Synthetic Imagingcited by 87
- 2024Distilling Diffusion Models into Conditional GANscited by 78
- 2024Towards Generalizable Tumor Synthesiscited by 65
- 2025Flow Matching for Medical Image Synthesis: Bridging the Gap Between Speed and Qualitycited by 25
- 2024Boosting Latent Diffusion with Perceptual Objectivescited by 20
- 2024cWDM: Conditional Wavelet Diffusion Models for Cross-Modality 3D Medical Image Synthesiscited by 19
13 more
- 2025ViT3: Unlocking Test-Time Training in Visioncited by 18
- 2024LeFusion: Controllable Pathology Synthesis via Lesion-Focused Diffusion Modelscited by 15
- 2025Learning neuroimaging models from health system-scale datacited by 5
- 2025Latent Diffusion Autoencoders: Toward Efficient and Meaningful Unsupervised Representation Learning in Medical Imagingcited by 4
- 2026WFM: 3D Wavelet Flow Matching for Ultrafast Multi-Modal MRI Synthesiscited by 4
- 2025Latent Diffusion Inversion Requires Understanding the Latent Spacecited by 2
- 2026Aligning Latent Geometry for Spherical Flow Matching in Image Generationcited by 2
- 2026CrossFlow: One-Step Generation Across Latent and Pixel Spacescited by 2
- 2025Synthesizing Accurate and Realistic T1-weighted Contrast-Enhanced MR Images using Posterior-Mean Rectified Flowcited by 1
- 2026The Learnability Gap in Medical Latent Diffusioncited by 1
- 2026MoRAE: Flow-Friendly Self-Supervised Latents for Text-to-Motion Generationcited by 1
- 2026Tokenizer-Generator Coupling in Medical Image Generationcited by 1
- 2026Flow Straight to Reality: Perceptually Consistent Flow Matching for Efficient Image Restorationcited by 1
Built on by
Not cited yet.