Stabilizing the Dynamic Low-Rank Training
Not on the map. Why?
Abstract (arXiv)
Training neural networks directly in a low-rank parameterization is an appealing route to reducing memory, compute, and storage simultaneously during both training and inference. Dynamic low-rank training (DLRT), which confines weights to a rank-r manifold via the Galerkin projection of the gradient flow, is particularly attractive because it identifies efficient subnetworks on the fly without specialized initialization or post-factorization. However, DLRT fails to find trainable networks under high compression. In this paper, we derive the gradient flow of the best rank-r approximation and point out that the offset of DLRT comes from a curvature-coupling term which is large and thus non-negligible under aggressive compression. Guided by this analysis, we propose a stable dynamic low-rank training method, named SDLRT, which maintains a lightweight compensation buffer that reinjects the top neglected singular directions. Additionally, we introduce a negative feedback on the truncation tolerance to stabilize each layer's rank. Experimentally, SDLRT reliably finds trainable subnetworks where DLRT collapses and as a PEFT adapter on DeBERTa-v3, it achieves the best average score on SuperGLUE at only 2.8% parameter overhead over LoRA.
Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 42 of its 56 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.
Builds on
42 of 56 references.
References · 42
- 2015Deep Compression: Compressing Deep Neural Networks with Pruning, Trained Quantization and Huffman Codingcited by 2,329
- 2018The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Finding Sparse, Trainable Neural Networkscited by 2,262
- 2019SuperGLUE: A Stickier Benchmark for General-Purpose Language Understanding Systemscited by 1,729
- 2021DeBERTaV3: Improving DeBERTa using ELECTRA-Style Pre-Training with Gradient-Disentangled Embedding Sharingcited by 1,254
- 2023SparseGPT: Massive Language Models Can Be Accurately Pruned in One-Shotcited by 1,121
- 2023A Simple and Effective Pruning Approach for Large Language Modelscited by 800
- 2023LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Modelscited by 650
- 2019Linear Mode Connectivity and the Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 637
- 2018Rethinking the Value of Network Pruningcited by 599
- 2024GaLore: Memory-Efficient LLM Training by Gradient Low-Rank Projectioncited by 463
- 2019Implicit Regularization in Deep Matrix Factorizationcited by 405
- 2024SliceGPT: Compress Large Language Models by Deleting Rows and Columnscited by 385
30 more
- 2024LoRA+: Efficient Low Rank Adaptation of Large Modelscited by 377
- 2020The Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Pre-trained BERT Networkscited by 275
- 2020Comparing Rewinding and Fine-tuning in Neural Network Pruningcited by 240
- 2019What's Hidden in a Randomly Weighted Neural Network?cited by 237
- 2023DepGraph: Towards Any Structural Pruningcited by 203
- 2023A Survey on Deep Neural Network Pruning-Taxonomy, Comparison, Analysis, and Recommendationscited by 202
- 2020Proving the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: Pruning is All You Needcited by 201
- 2023Structured Pruning for Deep Convolutional Neural Networks: A surveycited by 122
- 2021A Unified Lottery Ticket Hypothesis for Graph Neural Networkscited by 118
- 2023LoSparse: Structured Compression of Large Language Models based on Low-Rank and Sparse Approximationcited by 104
- 2019One ticket to win them all: generalizing lottery ticket initializations across datasets and optimizerscited by 102
- 2020The Lottery Tickets Hypothesis for Supervised and Self-supervised Pre-training in Computer Vision Modelscited by 91
- 2020Optimal Lottery Tickets via SubsetSum: Logarithmic Over-Parameterization is Sufficientcited by 81
- 2021Initialization and Regularization of Factorized Neural Layerscited by 58
- 2020Learning Low-rank Deep Neural Networks via Singular Vector Orthogonality Regularization and Singular Value Sparsificationcited by 53
- 2023LoRAPrune: Structured Pruning Meets Low-Rank Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuningcited by 53
- 2021Sanity Checks for Lottery Tickets: Does Your Winning Ticket Really Win the Jackpot?cited by 52
- 2022Low-rank lottery tickets: finding efficient low-rank neural networks via matrix differential equationscited by 43
- 2022Unmasking the Lottery Ticket Hypothesis: What's Encoded in a Winning Ticket's Mask?cited by 38
- 2021GANs Can Play Lottery Tickets Toocited by 32
- 2022Implicit Regularization in Hierarchical Tensor Factorization and Deep Convolutional Neural Networkscited by 27
- 2024A Survey of Lottery Ticket Hypothesiscited by 24
- 2023Rethinking Graph Lottery Tickets: Graph Sparsity Matterscited by 23
- 2022SGD and Weight Decay Secretly Minimize the Rank of Your Neural Networkcited by 19
- 2022Convolutional and Residual Networks Provably Contain Lottery Ticketscited by 16
- 2023Robust low-rank training via approximate orthonormal constraintscited by 13
- 2022SuperTickets: Drawing Task-Agnostic Lottery Tickets from Supernets via Jointly Architecture Searching and Parameter Pruningcited by 12
- 2023Geometry-aware training of factorized layers in tensor Tucker formatcited by 12
- 2023Successfully Applying Lottery Ticket Hypothesis to Diffusion Modelcited by 11
- 2020Low-Rank Training of Deep Neural Networks for Emerging Memory Technologycited by 3
Built on by
Not cited yet.