mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

AnchorRep: Defending LLMs Against Cross-Model Adversarial Transfer via Representation Repulsion

arXiv 2609.32602 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LG cs.AIcited by 0

On the map: LLM safety and security → Prompt injection and agent security also fits: Backdoor and data poisoning attacks

Abstract (arXiv)

Adversarial attacks optimized on a single open-weight LLM can transfer to and jailbreak architecturally different models, allowing an attacker with white-box access to one model to compromise independently deployed systems. This creates a shared vulnerability across models, yet existing defenses are not designed for this cross-model threat. We find that cross-model transfer aligns with shared internal representation geometry, making it a natural defense target. AnchorRep targets this geometry directly with a lightweight LoRA adapter that pushes the defended model's internal representations of harmful prompts away from those of a frozen anchor model on the same prompts. Training uses a small set of harmful prompts and no adversarial examples. Across five models and four architectural families, AnchorRep reduces cross-model attack success rate to <=1.1% on 2,000 transferred attacks (0% on two), including the largest drop on Mistral (36% -> 1.1%). Existing defenses can reduce transfer, but only at high cost either inducing up to 77% degenerate benign output or increasing over-refusal by up to 18%. Because such degenerate benign outputs are not captured by standard refusal-based metrics, we introduce the Benign Garble Rate to quantify them. Our results suggest that cross-model robustness can be achieved by shaping representation geometry, without requiring attack-specific training

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Placed in Prompt injection and agent security, one of 12 directions in LLM safety and security. Builds on 46 of its 50 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

46 of 50 references.

Closest ancestors · 1

Same direction, newest first

  1. 2024HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust Refusal6 Feb

Other references · 45

  1. 2023GPT-4 Technical Reportcited by 18,396
  2. 2024The Llama 3 Herd of Modelscited by 14,715
  3. 2021LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Modelscited by 14,380
  4. 2023Judging LLM-as-a-Judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arenacited by 8,626
  5. 2020Measuring Massive Multitask Language Understandingcited by 7,963
  6. 2017Towards Deep Learning Models Resistant to Adversarial Attackscited by 6,415
  7. 2021On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Modelscited by 4,033
  8. 2023Qwen Technical Reportcited by 3,344
  9. 2023Mistral 7Bcited by 3,164
  10. 2023Universal and Transferable Adversarial Attacks on Aligned Language Modelscited by 3,104
  11. 2016Pointer Sentinel Mixture Modelscited by 3,096
  12. 2024Phi-3 Technical Report: A Highly Capable Language Model Locally on Your Phonecited by 1,917
33 more
  1. 2019Similarity of Neural Network Representations Revisitedcited by 1,755
  2. 2023Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?cited by 1,651
  3. 2019Theoretically Principled Trade-off between Robustness and Accuracycited by 1,517
  4. 2023Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queriescited by 1,420
  5. 2023Representation Engineering: A Top-Down Approach to AI Transparencycited by 1,336
  6. 2023Inference-Time Intervention: Eliciting Truthful Answers from a Language Modelcited by 1,302
  7. 2023Llama Guard: LLM-based Input-Output Safeguard for Human-AI Conversationscited by 1,207
  8. 2019BERT Rediscovers the Classical NLP Pipelinecited by 1,059
  9. 2024Refusal in Language Models Is Mediated by a Single Directioncited by 1,032
  10. 2018Robustness May Be at Odds with Accuracycited by 880
  11. 2023AutoDAN: Generating Stealthy Jailbreak Prompts on Aligned Large Language Modelscited by 785
  12. 2023Tree of Attacks: Jailbreaking Black-Box LLMs Automaticallycited by 672
  13. 2022Transformer Feed-Forward Layers Build Predictions by Promoting Concepts in the Vocabulary Spacecited by 532
  14. 2024The WMDP Benchmark: Measuring and Reducing Malicious Use With Unlearningcited by 509
  15. 2023XSTest: A Test Suite for Identifying Exaggerated Safety Behaviours in Large Language Modelscited by 505
  16. 2024WildGuard: Open One-Stop Moderation Tools for Safety Risks, Jailbreaks, and Refusals of LLMscited by 496
  17. 2023SmoothLLM: Defending Large Language Models Against Jailbreaking Attackscited by 469
  18. 2016Transferability in Machine Learning: from Phenomena to Black-Box Attacks using Adversarial Samplescited by 446
  19. 2024The Platonic Representation Hypothesiscited by 382
  20. 2024Improving Alignment and Robustness with Circuit Breakerscited by 322
  21. 2020Do Wide and Deep Networks Learn the Same Things? Uncovering How Neural Network Representations Vary with Width and Depthcited by 245
  22. 2024OR-Bench: An Over-Refusal Benchmark for Large Language Modelscited by 244
  23. 2025FalseReject: A Resource for Improving Contextual Safety and Mitigating Over-Refusals in LLMs via Structured Reasoningcited by 58
  24. 2019On Learning Invariant Representation for Domain Adaptationcited by 39
  25. 2025Representation Bending for Large Language Model Safetycited by 30
  26. 2024Revisiting the Robust Alignment of Circuit Breakerscited by 12
  27. 2025Improving Large Language Model Safety with Contrastive Representation Learningcited by 8
  28. 2024Rethinking Invariance Regularization in Adversarial Training to Improve Robustness-Accuracy Trade-offcited by 7
  29. 2025Jailbreak Transferability Emerges from Shared Representationscited by 6
  30. 2025The Relationship Between Network Similarity and Transferability of Adversarial Attackscited by 3
  31. 2025Causes and Consequences of Representational Similarity in Machine Learning Modelscited by 3
  32. 2025Understanding Adversarial Transfer: Why Representation-Space Attacks Fail Where Data-Space Attacks Succeedcited by 1
  33. 2025Toward Understanding the Transferability of Adversarial Suffixes in Large Language Modelscited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.

Similar, not cited

Close in wording, no citation either way

  1. 2025Multi-Faceted Attack: Exposing Cross-Model Vulnerabilities in Defense-Equipped Vision-Language Models
  2. 2023Beyond Boundaries: A Comprehensive Survey of Transferable Attacks on AI Systems
  3. 2024Investigating Adversarial Trigger Transfer in Large Language Models
  4. 2025AntiDote: Bi-level Adversarial Training for Tamper-Resistant LLMs
  5. 2023AdaptGuard: Defending Against Universal Attacks for Model Adaptation
  6. 2026Open-Weight LLM Fine-Tuning Defenses are Susceptible to Simple Attacks
  7. 2026TamperBench: Systematically Stress-Testing LLM Safety Under Fine-Tuning and Tampering
  8. 2025Secure Transfer Learning: Training Clean Models Against Backdoor in (Both) Pre-trained Encoders and Downstream Datasets