mlsanityData to 14 Oct 2026

CAESAR: Clustering via Autonomous Embedding-Space Agglomerative Reorganization

arXiv 2609.32570 ↗First posted 26 Sep 2026cs.LGcited by 0

Not on the map. Why?

Abstract (arXiv)

Clustering algorithms that operate on nearest-neighbor graphs, such as FINCH (First Integer Neighbor Clustering Hierarchy), depend heavily on the quality of the embedding space they are given. However, pretrained vision and language model embeddings are not optimized for this purpose. We propose CAESAR, a method that reorganizes a pretrained embedding space: a reorganization network is trained to pull mutual nearest neighbors together and push non-neighbors apart, yielding a reorganized embedding space substantially better suited to clustering. CAESAR offers a second major advantage: it never requires the number of clusters K. This matters because in realistic unsupervised settings, K is typically unknown and discovering it is often part of the problem, yet most strong clustering methods take it as an input. We therefore design the entire CAESAR pipeline to infer K rather than assume it is known. Empirically, reorganizing the embeddings consistently improves clustering over the raw space on both text and image datasets. Since the few deep clustering methods that also infer K do not release their code, we complement controlled comparisons with methods that infer K on the same embedding space by comparisons with strong deep clustering methods that are given the true K, giving them a substantial oracle advantage. Even so, CAESAR outperforms all of them on text, achieves the best results on the most challenging image benchmark and remains competitive on the others. Reorganizing pretrained embeddings thus emerges as a simple and powerful route to clustering realistic data, where classes overlap and the number of clusters is unknown.

Key facts. No citing papers in the map yet (data through 14 Oct 2026). Builds on 19 of its 33 references that are in the map. First posted on arXiv 26 Sep 2026.

Builds on

19 of 33 references.

References · 19

  1. 2021Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language Supervisioncited by 33,744
  2. 2018UMAP: Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection for Dimension Reductioncited by 2,898
  3. 2021SimCSE: Simple Contrastive Learning of Sentence Embeddingscited by 2,173
  4. 2018Unsupervised Feature Learning via Non-Parametric Instance-level Discriminationcited by 1,845
  5. 2018Deep Clustering for Unsupervised Learning of Visual Featurescited by 1,028
  6. 2019How Contextual are Contextualized Word Representations? Comparing the Geometry of BERT, ELMo, and GPT-2 Embeddingscited by 784
  7. 2015Unsupervised Deep Embedding for Clustering Analysiscited by 767
  8. 2017Self-Normalizing Neural Networkscited by 598
  9. 2020SCAN: Learning to Classify Images without Labelscited by 352
  10. 2021With a Little Help from My Friends: Nearest-Neighbor Contrastive Learning of Visual Representationscited by 326
  11. 2020Contrastive Clusteringcited by 265
  12. 2019Representation Degeneration Problem in Training Natural Language Generation Modelscited by 255
7 more
  1. 2017All-but-the-Top: Simple and Effective Postprocessing for Word Representationscited by 212
  2. 2021SPICE: Semantic Pseudo-labeling for Image Clusteringcited by 104
  3. 2019Efficient Parameter-free Clustering Using First Neighbor Relationscited by 97
  4. 2023Image Clustering with External Guidancecited by 36
  5. 2022Semantic-Enhanced Image Clusteringcited by 25
  6. 2025Dimensionality reduction for homological stability and global structure preservationcited by 1
  7. 2025Persistent Multiscale Density-based Clusteringcited by 1

Built on by

Not cited yet.